Retired Police Superintendent, Peter MacLeod's free ebook: What really happened to Madeleine McCann?




Written by retired Police Superintendent PeterMac:

Many years have passed since the original e-book was published online, and I have been invited to take another look at it.

In the light of what we now know it seems that some of the Chapters still stand up to scrutiny, but others have been superseded.

Right from the start the Abduction story was supported by two pillars
  • Smashed Shutters
  • Man seen carrying child
The smashed shutters were shown to the world to have been a deliberate, calculated but on balance extremely stupid LIE by the parents - to their own close friends and relatives, incidentally, who had dutifully put the story into the public domain - when TV footage the following morning showed the hapless fingerprint girl trying to discover ANYTHING on the clearly untouched and unopened shutter.

The sighting by JT lingered for very much longer, and so the Chapter in which this is dissected and destroyed is still relevant to show the mendacity involved.
Some time later DCI Redwood destroyed this second remaining pillar by telling the world he had traced the man involved, who was merely carrying his child home from the crèche.   He also claimed that the original pyjamas had been produced for inspection (after 6 years) and the man’s original clothing had been seen.

Whether any of that was correct or in any sense ‘true’ is beside the point.  What the DCI was doing was publicly making it clear that the original story was a load of nonsense, and always had been.

But interestingly, this second pillar of “Man seen carrying child” was so powerful that even now, years after the DCI made that statement, the image of “Tannerman carrying child” is still on the Find madeleine web site.

Without it, they have nothing.

And since then the other “man carrying child” - Smithman - had to be brought out of the relative obscurity to which he had been consigned.  They cannot let the focus change.   And that focus is late evening on Thursday 3rd May

The DCI followed this up by making a grammatically contorted statement that “Madeleine leaving the  apartment alive does not follow with all of our thinking . . . “ and then went to the Algarve with ground penetrating radar and pickaxes to start digging.

The implication and the message to the McCanns and their friends was clear.

The Last Photo , the famous Pool photo was also said by the ever mendacious Mitchell to have been taken on that final day. Since Mitchell presented the photo some took a more independent look, at the EXIF Metadata, and at other aspects concerned with it.

There is little doubt now that the pool photo CANNOT POSSIBLY have been taken on Thursday 3rd.  They arrived too late on the Saturday, and in the event there were big fluffy clouds, as shown on the children’s play area photos.  Sunday was totally cloud free, but by late that evening a weather front had begun to move in which eventually brought rain and cold winds.  This front cleared only late on Thursday evening.

And although that is itself interesting, as is the forensic dissection of the people involved in that crime, the ones who handled the photos and who altered the EXIF, the main concern is as always slightly to the right of where we are looking.

A long term and valued researched known to many has looked at everything which happened after Sunday 29th, and realised that there is nothing which provides any concrete or credible evidence that Madeleine was still alive after that night.

Initial statements are vague and anodyne, but as soon as the Tapas group, mostly  educated medics, are put to the test in the Rotary interviews, they lapse into gibbering inconsequentiality.  Not one seems able to answer a straight question or use normal grammar or syntax, about anything after Sunday 29th. They were under pressure. All of them

The dogs were surely the final straw.

A British Police Advisor organised the top British human blood and human cadaverine detection Spaniels, handled and trained by the top British Police officer.     The dogs were given the run of the apartment and of all the others in the block. They were taken to an underground car park with a selection of cars, and another room with a selection of clothing.
They alerted to places and items concerned with the McCanns- and importantly to NO OTHER PLACES OR ITEMS, and that does need to be repeated as often as we have time to do so.

And the alerts allow a short and sad story to be told. 
Behind the sofa, on Kate’s trousers, and on Cuddle cat, to a shelf in the parent’s’ bedroom, where previously a blue tennis bag had been photographed,  then in the boot of the car, and on the key fob.
The sequence is not difficult to follow !


In the original e-book were chapters about people giving false information about abductions, and about false reactions in front of TV cameras.
They have not been updated, and will not be, as they are purely illustrative of the depths to which people will sink.

Peter

http://whatreallyhappenedtomadeleinemccann.blogspot.co.uk/

New blog showcasing PeterMac's free e-book 'What really happened to Madeleine McCann?', which is currently being updated.


New blog showcasing PeterMac's free e-book 'What really happened to Madeleine McCann?', which is currently being updated.

The book has been written from the point of view of a high ranking police detective who served for twenty eight years with Nottinghamshire Police, latterly in Child Protection.


http://whatreallyhappenedtomadeleinemccann.blogspot.co.uk/

Kate and Gerry McCann: What happened to the £1.5million News of the World Reward Fund?


On May 13 2007, ten days after Madeleine McCann disappeared from an apartment in Praia da Luz, the News of the World announced the "biggest ever newspaper reward" for information leading to Madeleine's safe return.

At the same time, the paper promised that if the reward remained unpaid for any reason, the portion made up of readers' donations [The other portion being made up of 'pledges'] would be shared equally by children's charities Barnado's, Childline and the NSPCC.

Early in December 2013, Gerry McCann was contacted by email at the University of Hospital of Leicester, where he is a Consultant Cardiologist.

He was asked what had happened to the Reward Fund. His reply, within the hour, was courteous and clear:

'That is something you will need to take up with News International.

'My understanding is that the reward was made up of pledges.

'Gerry'


News International, of course, no longer existed. On June 26th 2013, it had re-branded itself as News UK. But fourteen months earlier, in September 2011, it was still News International.

Ten weeks after the company had shut down the News of the World, a Press Officer was asked by email:

1. Is (the Reward Fund) still active?

2. How much was raised and what has happened to the funds since?

3. Given the demise of the newspaper, who is now responsible for the administration of this account?

4. What are the current plans for the Fund?

The reply, six days later, was also courteous and clear:

'Thank you for your enquiry.

'I can confirm that the funds raised by the appeal were donated in April this year (2011) to the official Madeleine Fund and the fund created by News of the World is no longer active.'

In April 2011, the donated portion of the reward money was indeed paid out by News International - but not to the children's charities, as they had promised. Instead, and with no announcement from either the News of the World or the McCanns, it was paid into Madeleine's 'Fund'.


https://www.facebook.com/MadeleineMcCannKnowTheTruth/photos/a.644238645658169.1073741827.644068969008470/1074155565999806/?type=3 

Kate and Gerry McCann's friend, paedophile Clement Freud was nominated for knighthood by their friend Lord Steel

By Sam Tonkin For Mailonline

Published: 19:52, 21 August 2016 | Updated: 20:09, 21 August 2016

Paedophile Clement Freud was nominated for a knighthood by Lord Steel

The disgraced former British MP and TV and radio star became a Sir in 1987 and when he died in 2009 aged 84 Lord Steel paid tribute with a glowing obituary.

dailymail.co.uk http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3751869/Paedophile-TV-star-Sir-Clement-Freud-nominated-knighthood-David-Steel-Cyril-Smith-gong.html



http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t12927-mccanns-musselburgh-races

http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t1915-references-to-paedophilia-in-relation-to-the-disappearance-of-madeleine-mccann#45700

Kate and Gerry McCann and Other People's Money

Extract from Ocean Club check-in list showing extras accrued by guests. (Source: http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/T/03_VOLUME%20_IIa_Page_621.jpg)


£10,000,000 – Taxpayers’ money spent to date on Operation Grange, the Met Police investigation into the disappearance of Madeleine McCann from Apartment 5a at Ocean Club, Praia da Luz on the night of May 3rd 2007.



£4,290,112  - Total income to Madeleine’s Fund, the McCanns’ limited company, to 31 March 2014.



£3,511,375 - Total expenditure by Madeleine’s Fund to 31 March 2014.



£1,138,487 – Raised for Madeleine’s Fund by sales and serialization of Kate McCann’s book madeleine , billed by Mrs McCann as “an account of the truth”.



£765,363 – Cash at bank, Madeleine’s Fund, 31 March 2014          .



£750,000 – Amount of taxpayers’ money spent on Operation Task, the Leicestershire Police operation to support the Portuguese investigation in 2007/8.



£500,000 – Amount Lord Bell claimed the McCanns paid his PR firm, Bell Pottinger, to keep them on the front page of every single newspaper for a year.



€500,000 – Amount  Portuguese judge has ordered Gonçalo Amaral pay Kate and Gerry McCann for their devastation, desperation, anxiety and pain.



£288,503 – Costs claimed by libel firm Carter-Ruck to have been incurred by January 2013 in the libel action McCanns v Bennett.



£21,257 – Money donated by News of the World readers to a Reward Fund for information leading to the safe return of Madeleine, which, if unpaid, should have been donated to three children’s charities but instead was paid out secretly to Madeleine’s Fund in April 2011. The McCanns continue to refuse to acknowledge the payout.



£10,000 – Amount of money Kate McCann would like other people to donate to Missing People while she rides 500 miles on a bicycle.



€242 – Extras run up by McCann, Gerald Patrick at Ocean Club in the days before the disappearance of his daughter.



£10 – Cost per hour of a babysitter at Ocean Club in May 2007, which the McCanns preferred not to spend.





Please donate to the fund set up for Gonçalo Amaral's appeal costs here:

As Operation Grange heads for closure - a letter to be sent to the Prime Minister by CMOMM - please contribute





As Operation Grange heads for closure - a letter to be sent to the Prime Minister by CMOMM - please contribute

The Admin Team and I have been thinking hard about the impending closure, or suspension, of Operation Grange.

We all feel that we cannot let this moment go without a public protest being made by us on behalf of all the members of CMOMM, past and present, who have given so much time over nearly seven years in the search for the truth.

Probably nearly every CMOMM member and most guests here will fundamentally disagree with the government's and police's decision to investigate only 'the abduction'.

We plan to send an open letter to the Prime Minister and the Metropolitan Commissioner (and maybe to many others) making it clear what evidence the police should have been examining, and should now examine. And if any British police force is to spend any more time on this, we want the remit changed and not limited to 'the abduction'.

We want the letter to clearly put before the Prime Minister the evidence that the police should have been looking at.

And this is where I want your help please.

Please post up summaries of the evidence you think the police should now look at - forensic evidence, circumstantial evidence, photographic evidence - any leads at all which you think could lead to the arrest and conviction of those who are responsible for the disappearance of Madeleine.

In about four weeks' time, the Admin Team will review all the contributions and put before members a draft of the letter we propose to send.

Any help at all in compiling a schedule of evidence would be more than welcome.

Many thanks.

Jill Havern


http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t13065-as-operation-grange-heads-for-closure-a-letter-to-be-sent-to-the-prime-minister-by-cmomm-please-contribute#347917

MADDIE'S 10TH ANNIVERSARY 29th APRIL 2017. How will it be marked?

Posted by Tony Bennett on CMOMM:

The title of this section of CMOMM is 'Maddie's 1st > 9th anniversaries', but the 10th one is coming up soon.

It looks like the actual last photo of Madeleine may have been taken on 29th April 2007; she seems rather to have 'disappeared' after that date.

It was several months ago that we learnt from Clarence Mitchell that even before her 9th anniversary, bids were being made for feature films and documentaries covering the 10th anniversary of her disappearance:
http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t12588-clarence-mitchell-describes-madeleine-mccann-story-as-a-daily-soap-opera-at-communications-conference-in-australia-speaks-of-receiving-bids-for-exclusives-for-10th-anniversary-of-madeleine-s-disappearance
There have been the annual media frenzies every 3rd May.

There was the 1,000-day 'bash' at Sir Richard Branson's 'Rooftop' Restaurant in plush Kensington.

All of this reminds us of these famous quotes:

On 3rd June 2007, just one month after Madeleine had ‘disappeared’, Dr Gerry McCann was already planning a ‘big event’ to mark Madeleine’s ‘abduction’. He told the press: “We want a big event to raise awareness that she is still missing…It wouldn’t be a one-year anniversary, it will be sooner than that.”  


Less than a month later, on 28th June 2007, Dr Gerry McCann said: “I have no doubt we will be able to sustain a high profile for Madeleine’s disappearance in the long-term”.

In October 2007, 'The Times' reported on the McCanns’ plans for a film or documentary about Madeleine, as follows: “Clarence Mitchell, the McCanns’ spokesman, would not speculate on whether Gerry and Kate would play themselves in any movie or whether their roles would be played by celebrity actors. He said: ‘While it may be hugely entertaining and a bit of fun to think of cast lists, we are a million miles away from that sort of thing’. The possibility of a film or television project is expected to be discussed by the Directors of the Madeleine Fund..."

One wonders how the bidding process is going at the moment.

How many countries and media outlets will want a slice of the action?

Will there be a bidding war, a kind of auction for who will pay the most to have the McCanns on their sofa?

What 'new angles' are being planned in advance?

Will Summers & Swan get more inside information from Operation Grange another book? That would certainly help sales!

A Crimewatch update perhaps, with yet another dodgy, wholly inaccurate reconstruction.

All of it with no genuine investigative probing of what really happened to Madeleine McCann.

Anyway, Clarence Mitchell will no doubt once again be the impresario at the centre of the action, so lest we forget who this man is, here's Richard Hall's unflattering 'take' on Clarence Mitchell's appearance at the Australian CommsCom conference earlier in the year:


http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t13061-maddie-s-10th-anniversary-29th-april-2016-how-will-it-be-marked-poll#347870 

The countdown to the closure of Operation Grange - 46 days left. CMOMM to consider the way forward while waiting for Dr Amaral's second 'Madeleine' book and Richard D. Hall's fourth 'Madeleine' film.


Post by Tony Bennett on the CMOMM forum:

The countdown to the expected closure of Operation Grange continues. I make it just 46 days left now.

If it does close in October without a solution - to the disappointment of many - it will be after...

...9 years and 5 months since Madeleine was reported missing...

...expenditure of a colossal £30 million or more, if we include the costs of all the official police investigations, the costs of all the lawyers and public relations advisers, the cost of the McCanns' private investigations, not forgetting of course two lots of half a million quid doled out, £500,000 to Kevin Halligen, most of it spent on living it up around the world with Shirin Trachiotis, and another £500,000 to Lord Bell of Bell Pottinger to 'keep the McCanns Maddie on the front pages for a year'...

...and by the looks of it, all that time, energy and money has brought us NOTHING.

Madeleine is not one inch nearer getting justice than she was 9 years and 5 months ago.

So are we going to let Operation Grange fade away without a whimper? Without a challenge? Without raising a voice for Madeleine?-----------------------

Response by Verdi:

NO!

Apart from the sterling work produced by the ever enthusiastic conspiracy buster, Richard D. Hall, who I'm sure will not let it rest, there must be any number of documentaries in the making just waiting for the right moment to go live.

Films, television series, biographies, magazine articles, studio appearances - bums on seats! I wouldn't be surprised if Ms Healy is already beavering away with the Epilogue 'My life without Madeleine - we'll never give up searching (all donations gratefully received)'.

Somehow I don't think this case will ever go away. It's not as though Operation Grange will be really missed is it, they haven't been particularly dynamic have they? More of a laughing stock that an entity to be taken seriously.

http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t12700-by-31-august-2016-there-will-be-just-33-days-left-to-the-closure-of-operation-grange-was-bbc-radio-4-10am-26-4-16-uk-police-to-close-operation-grange-soon-if-no-new-evidence-emerges

Richard D. Hall's 'Madeleine' films: http://www.madeleinefilms.net/page6.php

Gonçalo Amaral: "Maddie: The Truth of the Lie": http://goncaloamaraltruthofthelie.blogspot.co.uk/

Robert Murat revisted: 2 - How did he become a PJ translator?



Posted by Tony Bennett on the CMOMM forum:

This is an extract from my April 2010 article: 'Murat: From Arguido to Applause'.

It gives two alternative explanations as to how Robert Murat became the PJ's lead translator on the first few days after Madeleine was reported missing:

1. Stephen Carpenter happened to be walking past the Casa Liliana on the morning of Friday 4 May, heard for the first time about the abduction, and immediately jumped up and went up to the Ocean Club to volunteer his help, and

2. He was recommended by the British Ambassador, Bill Henderson.

The two explanations may not be incompatible

We know now of course that much of what Murat said about his movements from 1 to 4 May, when first interviewed by the PJ on 15 May 2007, was untrue.

What is clear is that Murat was well-known to the British Embassy, who were heavily involved in supporting the McCanns in the very early days, even to the extent of their begging the PJ: "Have pity on them, let them alone to wash their clothes" (or words to that effect).

I will add a poll.


Read full article here: http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t13054-murat-revisted-2-how-did-he-become-a-pj-translator

Gonçalo Amaral relates in 'The English Gag', how he found out that 'The Truth about the Lie' had been secretly banned by Kate and Gerry McCann


Chapter 6 of 'The English Gag' was commissioned for translation by Tony Bennett of the CMOMM forum:

Goncalo Amaral relates in ‘The English Gag’ how he found out that his book. 'The Truth About A Lie', had been secretly banned

Chapter 6 of A Mordaca Inglesa: ‘The English Gag’

Terrible news (translated by BJN)

I became aware that Gerry and Kate McCann had applied for an injunction against me, on behalf of themselves and their three children, at the Lisbon Civil Court. The defendants were me, Guerra e Paz SA, my publishers, Valentim de Carvalho Filmes, a film-producing company, the TV channel TV1 and the entire Portuguese population.

The aim of these proceedings was to censor of my hypothesis about the disappearance of Madeleine Beth McCann. Above all, it was intended to prevent the translation and publication of my book Maddie - A Verdade da Mentira, ‘The Truth of the Lie’, in the United Kingdom.

Quite frankly, I had not taken that source too seriously, thinking that, if this were true, it would almost certainly be doomed to failure, as a court would, surely, never make a ruling on what opinions could or could not be expressed in Portugal over the disappearance of Madeleine.

Not ever.

I thought it highly likely that the court’s reaction would be to proceed to punish the claimant for frivolous and vexatious litigation, that is, litigation in bad faith, since this legal action had been brought by people whose aim was to abuse the fundamental rights of third parties, by means of launching a claim that was manifestly unfounded.

On a quite modest esplanade, I was sitting waiting for lunch-time to arrive, in order to be able to read the day’s news in the newspapers.

I read one news article which said that ‘the majority’ of the population in the Figueira district of the province of Portimao, where around five years ago little Joana Cipriano was killed by her mother and uncle, believed that she had been ‘sold’.

What did they mean by ‘the majority’ of the population? On what possible basis was this worked out?.

My own reflections regarding this affair were about to be rudely interrupted. Domingos, the owner of the establishment, rushed towards me, looking very distressed, saying: ”Goncalo, Goncalo, they were just talking about you on the TV! I didn’t manage to get what they were saying, but it sounds bad!”.

I will go back a little in time to the summer of 2008, when the book Maddie - A Verdade da Mentira was published and in Portugal. At that time, the spokesman for the McCann couple, a professional spin doctor named Clarence Mitchell, had lost no time in announcing that legal action would be taken against me.

A long time had passed since then: fourteen months. Now, it was September 2009. There had been no news about the case during these fourteen months in question, except for fourteen months of hearing about the poor service being provided by the McCanns’ private detectives, fourteen months of explanations about their activities which, to say the least, were very odd, and could easily be challenged by any criminal investigator.

I finished drinking my coffee and mineral water and moved off towards the restaurant, where I was going to have lunch.

As I did so, Antonio and Jose Maria, members of staff and Benfica football supporters, approached me and told me what they had heard on the SIC television channel news.

They told me that a Portuguese court had secretly banned me from speaking about the Maddie case.

I said: “My friends, you are older than me, and like me, you remember what happened last year.  This simply cannot be right!”



It was clear that something was happening and that some court or other had made a ruling that would impact on me in some way. But which court was it? I was only able to find that out later.

Apparently, the McCanns had applied for an ex parte injunction. Not only was I not allowed to attend. I wasn’t even told about the application. Later I was to learn that my book had been banned.

I had already been getting fed up with receiving notifications of such matters all the time via the press. Several months earlier, when I had left Oporto to go to Unhais da Serra, I travelled across the Viriathus countryside, following the launch of the book ‘Crime and Justice’, which I had helped to edit. As I was travelling, I heard something about me on the radio. It was Radio Renascena. They had announced on the radio that criminal charges had been brought against me by the Public Ministry.

This was, apparently, the result of legal proceedings following a formal complaint by little Joana’s stepfather in October 2008.

But a full six months earlier, in April 2008, I had initiated a complaint of defamation against the very same citizen himself, and against his peculiar lawyer, Marcos Aragao Correia. My complaint was filed at the Public Ministry, and has yet to be heard.


[REST SNIPPED]

http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t8856-terrible-news-chapter-6-of-a-mordaca-inglesa-the-english-gag-by-dr-goncalo-amaral-how-he-learnt-on-portuguese-radio-that-his-book-had-been-banned-at-a-secret-court-hearing-that-he-knew-absolutely-nothing-about 

http://joana-morais.blogspot.co.uk/2009/12/goncalo-amaral-presents-english-gag.html 

http://www.mccannfiles.com/id289.html 

Madeleine McCann could not have died from an accident, nor from anything else, after 5.30pm on Thursday 3 May 2007




Madeleine McCann could not have died from an accident, nor from anything else, after 5.30pm on Thursday 3 May 2007

In July 2008, the Portuguese police and its judiciary, in the person of the regional Attorney-General, issued reports in which they said there was insufficient evidence for charging any one individual or individuals with responsibility for the disappearance of Madeleine McCann.

Two possible hypotheses were ‘archived’, or, as it were, left on the shelf, awaiting what they said would need to be ‘new and credible evidence’ sufficient to justify re-opening their investigation.

These were: (1) Madeleine had been abducted by a person or persons as yet unknown, or (2) Madeleine had died in the McCanns’ apartment and her body had been hidden.

The contrary view: she died in an accident after 5.30pm on 3 May

A different view from that of the Portuguese judicial authorities was set out by the investigation co-ordinator, Dr Goncalo Amaral, on 22 July 2008, in a book, ‘The Truth of the Lie’, and by one of his senior investigators, Detective Chief Inspector Tavares de Almeida, in an interim report dated 10 September 2007.

Tavares de Almeida’s view

This was how Tavares de Almeida expressed the investigation’s preliminary conclusion – I just reproduce his first six points:

“From everything that we have discovered, our files result in the following conclusions:

1 the minor Madeleine McCann died in Apartment 5A at the Ocean Club resort in Praia da Luz, on the night of 3 May 2007

2 simulation - a staged hoax - of an abduction took place

3 in order to render the child’s death impossible before 10.00pm, a situation of checking of the McCann couple’s children while they slept was concocted

4 Dr Gerald McCann and Dr Kate McCann are involved in the concealment of the corpse of their daughter, Madeleine McCann

5 at this moment, there seems to be no strong indications yet that the child’s death was other than the result of a tragic accident

6 from what has been established up to now, everything indicates that the McCann couple, in self-defence, did not want to deliver up Madeleine’s corpse immediately and voluntarily, and there is a strong possibility therefore that it was moved from the initial place where she died. This situation may raise questions concerning the circumstances in which the death of the child took place.


Goncalo Amaral’s view

These are the relevant extracts from Goncalo Amaral’s book (AnnaEsse’s translation):

“MADELEINE'S HOLIDAY

“On the fateful day of May 3rd, the attendance register at the play centre indicates that Madeleine arrived at 9.10, accompanied by her father. Her mother came to fetch her at 12.25 for lunch and took her back at 2 o'clock. After jogging on the beach and going to fetch the twins, she collected Maddie at 5.30pm. From that moment on, no other person saw the little girl, apart from her parents and their friends. What happened then in the apartment remains a mystery.

“THE INTERROGATIONS

“We finally decide to question her as a witness, but not to pose questions on the events after 5.30pm, the time at which she returned to the apartment with her three children.

“A DISAPPEARANCE, A WINDOW AND A BODY

"It is now important to present a summary of this case, based on our deductions: reject what is false, throw out what we can't show with sufficient certainty and validate that which can be proven.

“Point 5. The body, the existence of which has been confirmed by the EVRD and CSI dogs but also by the results of the preliminary laboratory analyses, cannot be found.
“The conclusions my team and I have arrived at are the following:“1. The minor, Madeleine McCann died inside apartment 5A of the Ocean Club in Vila da Luz, on the night of May 3rd 2007;
“3. Kate Healy and Gerald McCann were probably involved in the concealment of their daughter's body.
“4. The death may have occurred as a result of a tragic accident…”

-----------------------------------------------

I will refer to the theory that Madeleine died from an accident (or worse) after 5.30pm on 3 May as ‘The PJ Theory’.

If Madeleine died after 5.30pm on 3 May, what would the McCanns have had to do?

First of all, what is known for sure about the period between 5.30pm and 10.00pm?

Do we know for sure that Madeleine was with her family in her apartment at 5.30pm?

Well, that depends on whether or not you accept as gospel the claims of Gerry and Kate McCann, Catriona Baker and Charlotte Pennington that Madeleine was at a high tea in the Tapas restaurant from (according to Gerry McCann) 4.45pm onwards to somewhere between 5.30pm and 6.00pm.

But for the purposes of this article, I shall assume that she was.

Then we have the McCanns and their friends dining at the Tapas restaurant. There is agreement from the McCanns, their friends, other holidaymakers and Ocean Club staff that they were all settled at their table at around 8.30pm to 8.45pm.

So, if she had died, as suggested by both Goncalo Amaral and Tavares de Almeida, what would the McCanns have had to do between, say, 5.30pm and 10.00pm?

Or more pertinently, between when they arrived back at their apartment (5.30pm to 6.00pm) and sat down in the restaurant for dinner and drinks at 8.30pm to 8.45pm. A period of about three hours.

A preliminary point to raise is: were the twins present when, according to the PJ theory, Madeleine died? It seems unlikely. But according to the PJ theory, she must have been.

So I suggest that all these things must all happened during these three hours:

1 (If the twins were there) The McCanns would have had to make swift arrangements to move them out of the way whilst they decided what to do. That would take some time and probably they would have had to take them to one of their friends’ apartments.

2 They would first have to decide if Madeleine really was dead or could be revived or resuscitated. This may or may not have taken some time to decide.

3 There would then have to be a rapid decision-making process during which all the following decisions would have to be taken:

A Do we take her to hospital?

B If so, what are the risks?

C Can we pass this off as a genuine accident?

D Is there any other reason why we dare not risk going to hospital and possibly facing a post-mortem?

E Would we be investigated by the police?

Then (assuming that they then decided that they are not going to inform the authorities of Madeleine’s death) there are more decisions to be made about what to do with Madeleine’s body:

F Hide it straightaway?

G If so, where?

H Or ’phone a trusted friend first and ask for advice?

I Where can we get a car quickly so as to hide it?

J Have we got anything we can carry her body out in, without anybody thinking there might be a body in it?

K Can we get all this done before 8.30pm, when we’re supposed to meet our friends for dinner?

Maybe other related questions.

Then there’s another very tricky question to answer:

L Who do we tell about this?

M Just David and Fiona?

N Just Russell and Jane?

O All four of them?

P Matt and Rachael as well?

Q What can we say to the staff, to our other friends we’ve met on holiday?

R How are we going to explain this away?

They then will have to consider these questions:

S What is our excuse for not having Madeleine anymore?

T We could say that Madeleine must have wandered off somewhere

U We could say that we took her down to the beach and she got swept out to sea

V Maybe other ideas were discussed

W Or could we get away with faking an abduction

Let us presume at this point that they decided to tell all their friends: Dave, Fiona, Russell, Jane, Matt, Rachael (I assume at this point that those who say that Madeleine died after 5.30pm fully accept that the McCanns must have let all their Tapas 9 friends know what had happened to Madeleine - and that they all agreed on a plan - though I am aware that some still maintain that maybe, in this scenario, the McCanns didn’t say anything to any of their friends, none of whom therefore knew that Madeleine was dead).

In such a scenario, the McCanns would probably contact their friends on their mobiles. Or quickly nip round and knock on their doors.

Could they have discussed this desperate situation bilaterally? Surely not. They would have to have a meeting about it – at the very time they were all getting the children ready for bed and beginning to dress up for dinner.

In such a scenario, how likely is it that all six friends would have agreed within, say, 5-10 minutes that they would all play their roles in a fake abduction?

I suggest that it is unlikely in the extreme.

Even had they all rapidly agreed to go along with an abduction hoax later that evening at 10.00pm, there would be all manner of questions and suggestions.

We also need to bear in mind that on the basis of the PJ theory as it stands, this was a holiday to a place the McCanns had never been to before. They knew no-one in the area who could help them. They had no immediate access to a car, and so on. Madeleine had been happily playing with her brother and sister, her friends in the Lobsters club, and her Mum and Dad for six days.

So the McCanns and their friends would be rapidly tossing these sorts of ideas around:

X Where are they going to hide the body?

Y What about down the beach?

Z In the sea, using a boat?

AA In a derelict house in Praia da Luz?

BB Get hold of a car and drive the body somewhere well away from Praia da Luz.

Then, again assuming that they had all agreed to a plan of action, there would be loads more questions about (a) the apartment and (b) how to execute the hoax.

CC The apartment. If there had been a bad accident, or something equally bad had happened, who would clean the room?

DD How would it be done?

EE Was there any blood to clear away?

Then there would be questions about how the abduction hoax was going to be performed.

FF Who will raise the alarm?

GG What shall we all do after we raise the alarm? – Do we go frantically pretending to look for her?

HH Or do we ring the police?

II Do we inform the Ocean Club?

JJ When shall we do all this?

KK Do we need someone to pretend to see an abductor?

LL Who will do it? Jane perhaps?

MM What time shall we get her to say she saw someone?

NN Where shall we position the abductor?

OO What about a description? She needs to have a believable description to give to the police.

Then we come to them all sitting down for dinner at 8.30pm to 8.45pm. Do those who suggest Madeleine had died after 5.30pm believe that all nine of the Tapas 9 could have, with every appearance of calm, nonchalantly sat down for dinner that night as though nothing had happened? With the body already hidden by that time? – somewhere where no-one could find it? The room cleaned of any blood? The abduction hoax ready scripted and ready to carry out?

Could they chat away merrily to the Carpenter family and their children, for example, knowing that their first-born daughter had suddenly died within the past three hours?

I suggest it is unlikely in the extreme.

Some suggest that maybe the body wasn’t hidden before 8.30pm, but lay there while they were eating, with someone - presumably Gerry McCann - carrying his dead daughter to a temporary or final resting place somewhere after that.

Some of course suggest that Gerry McCann went back to the apartment during the meal, picked up his dead daughter clad in her pyjamas, and carried her for about half a mile or more through the streets of Praia da Luz, being seen at 10.00pm by the Smiths, who negligently failed to do anything about their extraordinary sighting for 13 days afterwards. We have discussed the likelihood of that scenario on CMOMM. The theory would require Gerry McCann to have made an extremely risky, not to say crass, decision to walk for some 15 or 20 minutes across the village at the very moment that his wife and/or others was raising the alarm.

So finally I ask: is the PJ theory that Madeleine died after 5.30pm on Thursday 3 May credible?

I ask this not to undermine the work of Goncalo Amaral and the PJ, who, after all, only had four months’ worth of evidence to consider before they wrote their interim report.

I ask this not to attack any of those, including some well-known names amongst established Madeleine McCann researchers, who defend this theory and have stuck by it.

I raise these questions only to tease out whether the PJ theory is a reasonable hypothesis that can be built on and developed……or whether it is now time to completely abandon it.

---------------

Discussion here: http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t13044-madeleine-mccann-could-not-have-died-from-an-accident-nor-from-anything-else-after-5-30pm-on-thursday-3-may-2007?vote=viewresult

PeterMac's Free e-book: What really happened to Madeleine McCann?

Gonçalo Amaral's 'Maddie: Truth of the Lie

Richard D. Hall: 'When Madeleine Died?'

Richard D. Hall: 'When Madeleine Died?'
Please click on image to view all three Madeleine films

Prime Minister introduces Prime Suspect to Royalty

Prime Minister introduces Prime Suspect to Royalty

Popular Posts

Followers

Follow by Email

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *