Kate and Gerry McCann don't want Britain to read Criminal Profiler Pat Brown's book

Pat Brown's interview on Jim Bohannon Show August 2 2011, regarding the banning of her book by NHS doctors, prime suspects in the concealment of their own daughter's body, Kate and Gerry McCann.





------
Related links:

McCann's Libel Trials/Lawsuits and Gagging Orders

Pat's book is now being sold online at Barnes and Noble http://tinyurl.com/3f649n9

and smashwords http://www.smashwords.com/books/view/76820

Kate and Gerry McCann, prime suspects in their daughter's disappearance, continue to use Carter Ruck to silence those who seek the truth

Posted by Tony Bennett, Secretary of the Madeleine Foundation

This is to inform you all that at 3.35pm this afternoon I collected a large package from my nearest local Royal Mail Sorting Office which they had said on a delivery card was 'a white bag' and they had been unable to deliver whilst I was away on holiday and because it was 'too large for my letter box.

I was able to collect it this afternoon, not knowing what it was.

The lady at the sorting office (she's a Cockney) said as she lugged the package slowly towards me: "Blimey, it's a good job that didn't fall off on to me 'ed".

On reaching home later on I weighed it on my bathroo mscales and it was nearly a stone in weight.

On opening the package, there was a 5-page letter from Carrer-Ruck alleging basically that articles on the MF website, MR leaflets, and around four dozen items on this forum constituted a breach of ONE of the High Court undertakings given by me to the McCanns on 25 November 2009.

The specific undertaking they say I breached was "not to repeat allegations that the Claimants are guilty of, or are to be suspected of, causing the death of their daughter; and/or disposing of her body; and/or lying about what happeend and/or seeking to cover up what they had done".

I have been asked to remove a total of 22 articles from the MF website, and amend or cut two others.

So far as this forum is concerned, I have been asked to remove 42 of my postings, I give a full list of what the McCanns want removed below. I am urgently discussing with admin the removal of those posts from public view and so at any time these may disappear.

Incidentally the removal of all the posts and articles that the McCanns want removed will not necessarily stop the McCanns from bringing contempt of court proceedings, which would be brought before a High Court Judge. If found guilty of contempt, the three main remedies are: fine, seizure of assets, and imprisonment.

It may be noted that I have to date made 3,501 posts on here, and only 42 are deemed by the McCanns to be in contempt, that's less than 1.2%. The other 3,459 are presumably not regarded as being in contempt.

I have endeavoured since 25 November 2009 to stick closley to the facts and what may be deduced from, rather than finger-pointing and accusing - based on the legal advice I received at the time.

I can't publish the Carter-Ruck letter here (for technical reasons), but I can publish my reply to them, send just after 5pm today:

The rest can be read here http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t3333-some-forum-posts-may-be-removed-due-to-a-carter-ruck-letter

The removed material can be seen here for the next few days http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/f36-new-the-gagged-section

Carter-Ruck to sue everyone

Evidence found in the McCanns apartment and hire car that Maddie is dead and the McCann's have faked her abduction and set up a fraudulent fund

Bunkered

EXCLUSIVE to mccannfiles.com

By Dr Martin Roberts
04 August 2011


BUNKERED

The McCanns may have been playing four-ball with us down by the sea-side in Portugal, but they'll need more than a sand wedge to dig themselves out of this.

Remember that trip to the beach on Tuesday 1 May - the one that didn't last too long because the weather was unkind and Madeleine preferred to be with her Mini Club playmates? And how the McCanns took the children back to their separate crèches for the last hour and a half, yet somehow managed to sign them in over an hour beforehand? Well it turns out they did something even more remarkable. They seem to have left Madeleine all on her own at the creche. (Some holiday!).

Although Madeleine was not signed out at the end of the day, her brother and sister were - at 5.20 p.m. We are at liberty to infer therefore that, collectively, their last hour and a half began at around 3.45 p.m., despite all three children having been signed in, apparently, at 2.30 p.m. that afternoon. Clerical error on the part of both parents no doubt.

Now here's the weird bit.

Mark Warner Nanny, Catriona Baker, gave a statement to the PJ on 10 May 2007, during which she told them that the only days they took the children to the beach were Tuesday afternoon (1 May 2007) between 15:30 and 16:30, on Wednesday (the next day) at the same time and on Thursday between 10 and 11 o'clock. (04-Processos, volume IV . Pgs. 870 to 873). She says nothing about any of the trips having been delayed or cancelled.

Which means the McCanns, having decided to take their children to the beach that afternoon for a change, delivered Madeleine back to an empty creche for the last hour and a half (commencing 3.45 p.m. approx.). Cat Baker will have left at least fifteen minutes earlier - for the beach. And the beach being no more than fifteen minutes walk away, the 'lobsters' should already have arrived on the sand before the McCanns had even set off for the creche. Did the two groups pass each other en route? Did the McCanns simply hand over the children there and then? 'Hi Cat! You can take over now. We'll just nip back and sign the registers an hour ago!'

Oh well. An account of the truth that contains only one lie can't be all bad can it? Unfortunately even one lie is one lie too many. And this one concerns a period of time over 48 hours before Madeleine is said to have been 'taken.' It's like having your car stolen on Wednesday and lying to police about where you drove to at the weekend.

There can be little doubt now that the McCanns have as many teeth in their respective mouths as Clarence Mitchell has in his.

http://www.mccannfiles.com/id232.html

------

related links:

BUNKERED

The creche enquiry

Baby minding club

A few oddities

Why have the McCanns lied about Maddie's coloboma for 4 years?

Operation Grange: Madeleine McCann – A potential Murder Enquiry

Posted on 03. Aug, 2011 by admin in News

By Steve Marsden

Today I phoned the Metropolitan Police to ask about their taking over from Leicestershire Constabulary and had this interesting telephone conversation.I recently learned from a trusted police source that the Metropolitan Police had officially taken up the Madeleine McCann investigation in London. This new line of enquiry is called Operation Grange.

SM: Hello, I’d like to speak to someone in connection with Operation Grange please.

Police: I’m not aware of that Operation…just give me one second.

A minute later the operator returned and gave me another phone number to call.

SM: Hello, I’m just calling to ask a few questions about Operation Grange.

Police: What’s the name of that operation again?

SM: Operation Grange.

Police: Ok, what was that?

SM: It’s the Madeleine McCann disappearance.

Police: Oh, alright ok, fine, yeah, we don’t usually use operation names here, what do you need to know?

SM: There doesn’t seem to be anything in the public domain so when did the operation start and what’s the scope of the operation? I just wondered if you can give me some background on Operation Grange.

Police: We haven’t very much talked to the media about the case at all. What we’ve said is we’re providing expertise to the investigators of the case. The Portuguese Authorities, the Portuguese Police retain lead. We’ve not made any suggestion that they’re not capable of investigating but we are assisting them and we have not given any details on it. It’s unusual for us to do that as it’s abroad and another police force is taking the lead on it.

SM: Is there any reason why the Met took over from Leicestershire Constabulary?

Police: I’m not sure we said anything about it at the time – for various reasons. We can’t be seen to criticize any other force. On the 12th of May the Home Office requested that the Metropolitan Police service bring their expertise to the case and on that evening we said that we would.

SM: And is this a full time operation and what size team is working on it?

Police: As I said we wouldn’t provide a running commentary but at the very beginning we said there were 30 officers who would be deployed, er, not continually but various tasks along with workload they have on other cases, er, but we have deployed 30 officers.

SM: In a normal case in Britain it’s not unusual for the police to give an ongoing commentary as to how it’s progressing so what…

Police: …I’ve only worked here 11 years but I would say it’s not common. We give information whilst it’s appropriate to produce but whilst there’s an investigation going on and where it’s potentially murder, we say very little, we say very little. You read a lot in the press but that doesn’t come from us. We deal with about 250 murders a year and all of them are dealt with in exactly the same way in terms of how we deal with the media.

I also discussed the fact that all FOI requests made to Leicestershire Constabulary under Operation Task were coming back with a blanket “no comment” and a wall of silence. The police officer I spoke to at the Met told me to put in FOI requests to them and do not assume that they would treat them the same [as Leicestershire Constabulary].

For anyone wishing to put in new FOI requests under Operation Grange, email them at:SCDFOIArequests@met.pnn.police.uk

I have to say that it was reasonably reassuring to hear that the Metropolitan Police are treating the case as “potential murder” instead of the McCanns’ nonsensical talk of abduction.

It is probably premature to expect miracles but for the first time in a British Police force we can just about hear the cops singing in tune with Goncalo Amaral.

--------

More information about Madeleine McCann can be found on our forum LINK

Source: http://fakedabduction.com/2011/08/operation-grange-madeleine-mccann-a-potential-murder-enquiry/

Scotland Yard WILL examine parents' possible guilt re Madeleine McCann - OFFICIAL

Here's an interesting question posed by one of our forum members regarding letters to and from New Scotland Yard regarding the case review of Madeleine McCann (letters here):

"I'm very confused about this whole process. I don't even understand the scope of this and the possible consequences. Say for instance that they question the parents and Tapas friends regarding the timeline inconsistencies and one of them cracks and reveals they have previously told lies. What can happen after that? Can anyone be charged with anything? Is there a crime like obstruction of justice in Portugal? Would they have to re-open the Portuguese enquiry for any action to follow?"

Tony Bennett's response:

"Good questions.

First of all, this is a REVIEW, similar to what is called a 'cold case review'. Essentially this means a group of officers trawling through thousands of documents and looking for possible new leads and lines of enquiry.

If there is evidence of a crime having been committed by one or more individuals, then the status of the review would change from REVIEW to INVESTIGATION - and, yes, that could lead to ARRESTS.

It is my understanding that as Madeleine McCann is British and all the Tapas group are British and as some of the alleged offences occurred in Britain that IF they have collectively covered up the death of Madeleine in Praia da Luz they could be charged under British law with a whole raft of offences:

* causing or allowing the death of a child (McCanns)

* hiding a body and preventing an inquest (McCanns)

* interfering with or perverting the course of justice - or conspiracy to interfere with or pervert the course of justice (McCanns, Tapas friends, and anyone else involved in the cover-up)

* conspiracy to obtain a pecuniary advantage by deception (all those involved in setting up and running the Fund)

* interference with witnesses (Brian Kennedy).

I think Cameron, Sir Paul Stephenson, and the McCann Team hoped that the Review would merely be an excuse to lambast the Portuguese Police once again for their incompetence, and announce that the Portuguese Police had lamentably failed to follow up potential 'sightings' of Madeleine, therefore giving the McCanns' narrative the official backing of Scotland Yard.

Those of us who believe the evidence strongly suggests that Madeleine McCann died in Apartment G5A have, I believe, a solemn duty to explain this to DCI Andy Redwood and his colleagues."

Discussion about Maddie's case review here and here

Criminal profiler Pat Brown is putting together a team to go to Portugal

Pat Brown on Twitter https://twitter.com/#!/ProfilerPatB

------

A message to Pat Brown from a member of our forum:

Pat, if you read this post, please please please push this as far as you can. With a sound professional background and reputation you can do what the rest of us would like to do (red flag all the weirdness of the case to a mass audience and try and get some answers/explanations for the contradictions etc) but do not have the opportunity or access to the right people. This is a Golden Opportunity to change the course of this peculiar situation, where two people seem able to control everyone and everything they wish despite some gargantuan flaws in the theory they are persuing.

The McCanns seem to have a free license to defame anyone who questions their theory, despite there being not a scrap of evidence for that theory. Yet are able to wield the axe over anyone who, using the official investigation files in the public domain, comes up with a different theory or scenario. They can contradict themselves with impunity (see thread on The Eye/Coloboma for a sledgehammer of a lie), but supress anyone who publicises their own spoken error!

I think the McC's should be put in a situation where they clarify all the errors and contradictions they have made as a quid pro quo for the millions and millions of pounds from the Portugese and British public purses they have had spent on this (but they say nothing has been done - pah!)

There has to come a point where the McC's admit the wrongs they have and continue to do, or just go away. This cannot go on for 4 more years, it really can't.

So please Pat, help bring this dreadful media whitewash, this never-ending series of contradictions and arrogant behaviour to it's conclusion for everyones sake. Thank you and good luck!!

-------

Related link:

Criminal profiler Pat Brown: "If The Profile of the Disappearance of Madeleine McCann was "rubbish", the McCanns wouldn't have paid it any mind."

-----------------

Spudgun in the Telegraph/Amazon Censors Madeleine McCann Publication - spudgun has also now been censored!

Interesting from Spudgun re Martin Grimes

Spudgun's blog http://spudgunsspoutings.blogspot.com/

Spudgun on twitter http://twitter.com/#!/spudgun01
.

Brian Kennedy’s actions following the disappearance of Madeleine McCann

"Perhaps the single most shocking finding in our article is that the evidence strongly suggests that Brian Kennedy and the McCann Team arranged and funded the search of the Arade Dam in Portugal, which was claimed to be looking for Madeleine’s remains."

----------------------------

A short biography of Brian Kennedy followed by analysis of his involvement in searching for the truth about Madeleine McCann.

Introduction

The McCanns’ chief reputation manager, Clarence Mitchell, recently described the disappearance of Madeleine as ‘a complete mystery’. One of the persons most closely associated with attempts to unravel this mystery is Cheshire-based multi-millionaire and double glazing magnate, Mr Brian Kennedy. The purpose of this article is to examine his actions in the Madeleine McCann case.

There are essentially two rival versions of what happened to Madeleine.

The McCanns claim that Madeleine was snatched from their holiday apartment during the evening of Thursday 3 May 2007. They say this event happened between 9.10pm, when Dr Gerald McCann is said to have left the apartment after checking that all was well with the children, and 9.15pm when their friend Jane Tanner is said to have seen a man carrying a child.

By contrast, the team of Portuguese detectives that originally investigated the case reached the conclusion that Madeleine had died in the McCanns’ holiday apartment and that her parents, with or without the help of others, must have hidden or disposed of her body. The senior detective in the case, Goncalo Amaral, wrote a book, A Verdade de Mentira - ‘The Truth About a Lie’, setting out the evidence for their conclusion.

Many people believe one explanation or the other. Many others do not know what to believe. Leaving these theories aside, we will look at Brian Kennedy’s actions in this case and discuss the extent to which they support one or other of the above accounts of the reason her disappearance.

Brian Kennedy’s connection with the disappearance of Madeleine McCann was first announced in September 2007, four months after the McCanns reported Madeleine missing. He has been portrayed as an unselfish, warm-hearted and generous man who for purely altruistic motives has given up a significant amount of his time and energy and a lot of money to try to find Madeleine McCann. I shall explore that claim in this article.

But first, it is necessary to take a brief look at the life and career of Brian Kennedy prior to September 2007 when his interest in the disappearance of Madeleine McCann became known.

Read Madeleine Foundation article here http://t.co/kZDRwqn

Maddie McCann, victim of faked abduction

Another cruel and sick hoax sighting by Clarence Mitchell and Kate & Gerry McCann as they continue to exploit Maddie for money

Article by journalist Mike 'Spudgun' Hardy

Thursday, 28 July 2011

Madeleine McCann and the Kingdom of Clarence

Given that I am currently enjoying something of a reputation as having a big, fat, scurrilous mouth, (possibly true), and that I never know when to keep it closed, (ALSO possibly true); I though I would confound my detractors and keep it short and sweet!

Am I alone in thinking how utterly preposterous and somewhat disturbing it is, that at LEAST 25 Media outlets, Newspapers and BROADCASTERS, are currently reporting about a little girl having been found in INDIA that resembles Madeleine McCann and that the McCanns are awaiting the results of the DNA test; whilst at the same time, the police and authorities in the LEH province of India, the scene of this furore, are all utterly bemused and baffled, asking questions as to what everyone is going on about as they have no KNOWLEDGE of ANY girl having been found OR of any DNA tests!!!

Clarence Mitchell has made about 4 statements concerning this latest "sighting", ALL of which are nonsensical and actually CONTRADICT each other.

Of course, there are MANY people who DO follow this case with open hearts, hoping upon all hope that it IS the little girl, and they will continue to pray and hope for Madeleine's safe return.

They will also lambast and vilify the PRESS and Media who report such "sightings" and developments for raising false hope.

Whereas, if they examined such 'reports' and continued widespread coverage with a little more scrutiny and impartiality, they would arrive at the same, logical conclusion.

That the people with whom they hold in so much reverence, adulation and close affection, (Team McCann), are the ones actually responsible for the stream of fabricated stories, hoax's and fake sightings; that the British PRESS and their respective editors are their servile minions;

And that Clarence Mitchell is their Master!

posted by spudgun at 06:24

http://spudgunsspoutings.blogspot.com/2011/07/madeleine-mccann-and-kingdom-of.html

Clarence Mitchell, the McCanns and those scurrilous CURRY Munchers!

http://uk.missingkids.com/missingkids/servlet/NewsEventServlet?LanguageCountry=en_GB&PageId=4146

Interesting from Spudgun re Martin Grimes

Link

Posted on our 'Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann' forum here - with more info about the hoax 'sighting' here

--------

McCann family spokesman Clarence Mitchell said: "Kate and Gerry do not believe the child seen in India was Madeleine. They have seen photographic evidence and concluded that it was not her."

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2011/07/28/madeleine-mccann-girl-spotted-in-india-not-our-missing-maddie-say-parents-115875-23303698/#ixzz1TQNbBeSb

-----------

Talking to some media persons here Thursday evening, Abdul Gani Mir, deputy inspector general of police (DIG), said: ‘We have not recovered any missing foreign girl from Leh.’

‘There is no question of carrying out a DNA test since we don’t have the girl. Our field staff in Leh have confirmed that no such girl has been recovered by them.’

http://www.inewsone.com/2011/07/28/kashmir-police-deny-finding-missing-british-girl/65649

Images courtesy of The McCann Gallery here:

Why haven't the McCann's sued Martin Brunt?

.

Criminal profiler Pat Brown: "If The Profile of the Disappearance of Madeleine McCann was "rubbish", the McCanns wouldn't have paid it any mind."

https://twitter.com/#!/ProfilerPatB

Read Criminal Profiler, Pat Brown's book "Profile of the disappearance of Madeleine McCann" about the death and concealment of Madeleine McCann (and the subsequent fraudulent fund which has been used to pay the McCann's mortgage) based on all the evidence that is available....click HERE
-----
UPDATE

It looks as though the McCanns have had Pat Brown's book Carter-Rucked from Amazon but you can still read it here http://tinydoc.it/5b68f9 or here http://womenincrimeink.blogspot.com/

Other people who have been Carter-Rucked using public money donated to the Fund to search for Maddie click here

Another update - Pat's book is now being sold at online Barnes and Noble store http://tinyurl.com/3f649n9 and http://www.smashwords.com/books/view/76820

Related link:

Madeleine McCann- AMAZON changes its mind on CENSORSHIP

Kate and Gerry McCann "burst into laughter as they promoted her book about their lost daughter Madeleine."

Friday June 24,2011

By Daily Express Reporter

FOR once, grieving Kate McCann can find something to smile about. So often pictured as a sad, withdrawn figure, she and husband Gerry burst into laughter as they promoted her book about their lost daughter Madeleine.

The couple were in Amsterdam to launch the Dutch edition of the book which they hope will help to boost the search for Madeleine across Europe.

The heart-rending memoir has already topped the best-seller list in Britain and Australia, and hundreds of thousands of copies have flown off the shelves.

A spokesman for publishers Transworld said: “We hope it will reach number one across Europe and that somebody with important information will read it and be moved to come forward.”

Copies have been snapped up in Portugal, where Madeleine, then three, went missing from a seaside resort on the Algarve during a family holiday in 2007. The McCanns, both 43, from Rothley, Leics, have been given a boost by the amount which the book has raised towards their fund to back the continuing search for their daughter.

They say they have new hope that she will be found after Scotland Yard agreed to review the investigation into her disappearance.

http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/254636/At-last-sad-Kate-McCann-can-smile-again

------

Posted on 'Complete Mystery of Maddie McCann' forum here and Missing Madeleine forum here

The photograph of happy Kate and Gerry was removed from the Express article - according to author David Bret "the sub-editor of the Express explained over the phone yesterday that no papers will print anything regarded as unfavourable regarding the McCanns, and that the couple's "office" had complained that a picture of them laughing was unfavourable at it is a "misrepresentation" of how they feel, which was why they insisted it should be removed." Link here

http://images.dailyexpress.co.uk/img/dynamic/1/285x214/254636_1.jpg

-------

Grieving Kate McCann - a sad, withdrawn figure

Are these photos also a misrepresentation of how they felt just days after Maddie was 'abducted' by an alleged paedophile ring?

Dr Kate McCann's children's porn book sells enough copies to fund Scotland Yard's search

Page 129 of Kate McCann's porn book which she hopes will be read by Maddie, the twins

and the paedophile who's got her

Sunday June 5,2011

By Sunday Express Reporter

KATE McCANN’S book about the disappearance of her daughter has already raised £2million for the Madeleine fund.

In three weeks, 165,000 copies of Madeleine have been sold in Britain, while the translated version is flying off the shelves in Portugal, where it hit number four in the top 10 last week.

Claudia Nogueria, who speaks for the McCanns in Portugal, said: “We hope it will reach the number one position and that somebody living here with important information will come forward.”

The book has also shot to the top of the charts in Australia and will soon be launched in Holland and Spain.

The 384-page hardback is Kate’s account of the disappearance of her three-year-old daughter on a family holiday in 2007.


Read more: http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/250873/Kate-McCann-s-book-raises-2m-for-MadeleineKate-McCann-s-book-raises-2m-for-MadeleineKate-McCann-s-book-raises-2m-for-Madeleine#ixzz1ONzpBG3I

------

A couple of comments from our forum:

Good! Let's hope Kate will hand over the money to Scotland Yard so they can fund the search for the daughter they lost when they left all three of their children alone in an unlocked apartment.

------

Kate's book sells because it is full of sex, (her and Gerry) violence, (her bad temper and mood swings) filthy language (against PJ and G Amoral) and sickening descriptions of her daughter's private parts .

Heres hoping that Scotland Yard take this case seriously and do a reconstruction

------

2 million divided by 165 thousand is more than 12 pounds per copy.
Since Amazon and WHSmiths were selling it at a tenner, this figure seems, how shall we put it, unlikely.

------

Discrepancies and lies in Kate's book compared to the statements in the official police files can be read here and here aswell as the McCann's hoax about Maddie's coloboma which can be read here

The inconsistencies/changing stories

Did Madeleine have coloboma?

2. Kate McCann's book: 'Madeleine' - includes shocking section of book that highlights even more neglect of the twins just days after Madeleine went missing.

Complaint against the BBC upheld: Gonçalo Amaral did not use offensive language about the McCanns

Posted by AnnaEsse on her blog

The BBC's Editorial Complaints Unit has published its ruling on complaints that one of their reporters had misquoted Gonçalo Amaral outside the court in Lisbon.

BBC East Midlands 30/05/2011

ECU Ruling: East Midlands Today, BBC1 (East Midlands), 12 January 2011

Publication date: 30 May 2011

Complaint

The programme included a brief exchange between a reporter and Gonçalo Amaral (a former policeman who had worked on the disappearance of Madeleine McCann and had since written a book on the case). One word in the exchange was bleeped, and the report gave the impression that this was because Sr Amaral had used offensive language about the MrCanns. A viewer complained that this was inaccurate and unfair to Sr Amaral.

Outcome
The reporter's belief, reinforced by others on the programme team who viewed the recording, was that Sr Amaral had indeed used an English phrase which included an offensive term applied to the McCanns. On further examination, however, it became clear that Sr Amaral had been speaking Portuguese, and that an inoffensive phrase had been misconstrued. Upheld

Further action
The Editor of the programme has discussed the outcome with the producer and reporter involved. In future, the team plans to use interpreters if clips from interviews are unclear.

-------

Much more about this is posted on Joana Morais' blog with video and images - and I hope Dr Amaral will now sue the British newspapers.

http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2011/06/mccann-case-complaint-against-biased.html#comment-form...TAKE

------

Little victories - posted by Johanna who instigated the complaint

-------