British Consulate refuse to help paralysed British Citizen stranded in kuwaiti hospital


John Walker, 62, is a British citizen who has been living in the UAE - United Arab Emirates, for the past 33 years. He has been in the care of Al Kuwaiti Hospital for the past month for severe haemorrhage. His residency visa and passport have expired.

After living for 33 years in the UAE, a 62-year-old British national ended up ill, illegal and with an expired passport.

For a month, John Garth Walker was treated at Kuwaiti hospital for severe haemorrhage which has affected his talking and also left him paralysed. He can barely talk and says he is lonely and wishes to go back home to his family.

Walker, who is discharged now, was admitted to the hospital by the police after the management of the furnished apartment found him seriously ill in his room.

Walker's residency visa was issued in 2005 from Al Ain and it shows that he was sponsored by a relative. His visa expired when his passport expired in 2008. As per his visa he is not allowed to work.

British officials are ignoring the plight of an UK citizen: Hospital refutes consulate's claims

The British Consulate said on Sunday it was following the case of a Briton who has been in a Sharjah hospital for more than a month.

But Al Kuwaiti Hospital said the consulate has not responded to its requests to take an interest in the case.

The hospital said Walker should be discharged, but his bills need to be paid.

"We tried several times to contact the British Consulate for some assistance with the Walker case, but there has been no response," a spokesman from Al Kuwaiti hospital said.

He said that when Walker was first admitted around 40 days ago, the hospital had contacted the consulate. Since then, a representative had visited only once, the spokesman said.

"A lady from the consulate gave us her phone numbers and then left. And despite our repeated calls, they are not responding. We even expected someone from the consulate to contact us after his story was published in Gulf News [yesterday], but the man is still being ignored," the spokesman said.

"Walker must be discharged. He should have been discharged more than a week ago. Nobody has visited him and there is a hospital bill that should be paid," he said.

However, Simon Goldsmith, a spokesman from the British consulate, told Gulf News yesterday that the consulate was following the case.

When asked to respond to the comments from Al Kuwaiti hospital, Goldsmith said he was bound by "confidentiality."

"I cannot comment on this. It is a confidential consular issue," he explained.

That is all he could say about the Walker issue, he added. He refused to give further details about the patient or his background.

Source: Gulf News


The McCanns on their way home after Government assistance
.

££££££'s for Kate on Mother's Day


By Tracey Kandohla: People.co.uk

Brave Kate McCann faces new heartache this morning as she wakes up to her second Mother's Day without daughter Madeleine.

But GP Kate is also set to get a boost - thanks to her three-year-old twins Sean and Amelie. They are expected to hand her daffodils at their local Roman Catholic church during a service for missing children.

Maddie (below) was just three when she vanished from a Portuguese holiday flat 22 months ago. But Kate, 40, and hubby Gerry refuse to give up hope she is still alive.



Someone has a sense of humour at People


A fellow worshipper in Rothley, Leics, said: "It's going to be a tough day for Kate but hopefully the twins will help." Kate and Gerry, 40, have drawn strength from the church in their torment.

Spokesman Clarence Mitchell said: "Their faith's been of great help."

Heart specialist Gerry returned to Portugal in January for the first time in 16 months in a bid to improve strained relations with local cops looking for Maddie.

Heartache on Maddie's Birthday, just a few days after her 'abduction'

Jersey's version of Harold Shipman: Mass murder in NHS gets covered up the Jersey way


The following post is written by Senator Stuart Syvret

IN THE JERSEY HOSPITAL.

A Death-Delivering Maniac?

Jersey’s Then Attorney General Michael Birt Pulls the Plug On The Police Investigation.

So it begins.

It is with trepidation I publish the material below – for reasons which will become plain within the first few paragraphs.

The document I publish here was tabled before the court in London, as one item of evidence in the Applicant’s bundles.

To be clear – this went before the two judges – and even then, they chose to disregard the public interest – instead asserting that we should take up these matters with the Jersey justice apparatus.

Notwithstanding the fact that the same administration of justice apparatus was responsible for covering-up what is revealed.

The document I publish is a secret Police report from 1999.

It is self-explanatory.

The subject of this report – one Andrew Charles Marolia – came to the attention of the Police because of – comparatively – minor offences involving the stealing of drugs from the Jersey General Hospital.

He was charged with these comparatively minor offences, pleaded guilty – and was sentenced to two years unsupervised probation.

I was a member of the then Health & Social Services Committee, and later became President of the Committee in December, 1999.

Marolia was sacked from the General Hospital in response to the comparatively minor offences.

However, being a former military Nurse, who has served in the first Gulf war – he found a ready stream of politicians and others to lobby on his behalf to be allowed to be re-employed in the Hospital.

On one occasion he appeared before the H & SS Committee to make a formal appeal.

It was rejected because of the conviction for the minor offences.

Still, I continued to be lobbied by politicians and others, who wanted the Committee to employ Marolia again.

I raised the issue of this lobbying in a face-to-face meeting with the then Chief executive of Health & Social Services, Graham Jennings.

I did not want Marolia to be re-employed, and Jennings was certainly of the same opinion.

He explained that Marolia was obviously a wholly unsuitable individual to be in health care. Jennings went on to say that, in any event, we couldn’t be expected to take Marolia back even if we wanted to – as he was deeply unpopular with other staff – who were “mounting a vendetta against him”. To illustrate the extremity and unreasonableness of the “personality clash”, Jennings said to me, “a member of staff has even suggested that he killed people. It’s utter rubbish. But don’t worry – the Police have investigated the matter, and whilst they were too gung-ho and wanted to start exhuming the non-cremated bodies, the Attorney General Michael Birt has told them to drop it, because he doesn’t believe their are any grounds for securing a conviction.”

At the time, I took this at face value. After all, if your professional Health Chief Executive tells you this – and relays to you the fact that no less an authority than the Attorney General has dismissed the allegations – who is a mere politician to doubt them?

But – some years later – around 2005, perhaps – a conscientious member of staff at H & SS leaked this Police report to me.

As is clear from the Report, Jennings had a copy – but he never told my Committee or me of its existence.

It took a whistle-blower to reveal it.

When I read the report you are about to read, I was speechless.


-----

Quote of report off Senator Stuart Syvrets blog:

STATES OF JERSEY POLICE

Your ref:

Our ref: RHLeB/PAO

Date: 12th May 1999.

TO:

M C St. J. Birt Esq. QC.
HM Attorney General
Law Officers' Department
Morier House
Halkett Place
St. Helier
JE1 1DD

Dear Attorney General

Andrew Charles MAROLIA

I refer to the attached report by Detective Inspector Faudemer concerning the above named who is currently on remand from the Magistrates' Court for a variety of charges involving Drugs, Theft and Firearms.

Mr. Faudemer's report details allegations and innuendo, the most serious of which indicate that Marolia may, over a period of time, have terminated the lives of some patients at the General Hospital where he was employed as a Nurse.

I support Mr. Faudemer's recommendation that if enquiries are to continue a phased approach should be undertaken, the first of which would be to collate further evidence. However, I recognise that the continuation and development of this investigation will require a high level of legal advice and guidance from your department and our work will impinge upon the Health Authority and Viscount and given the uniqueness and sensitivity of such an investigation I feel it is appropriate to hold a high level meeting with yourself and others to whom I have copied this letter.

The purpose of the meeting will be to receive an oral brief from Mr. Faudemer who will be able to answer questions which you and others may have, followed by a general discussion to determine the way forward.

The meeting has been arranged for Thursday 20th May at 2.15 p.m. in the Conference Room at Police Headquarters and I look forward to seeing you.

Yours sincerely,

R. H. Le Breton
Chief Officer

c.c. Legal Adviser - Mr. Ian Christmas, Deputy Viscount - Mr. P. De Gruchy, Chief Executive Health Service - Mr. G Jennings, Deputy Chief Officer - Mr. R. Jones, Superintendent - T. Garrett, Director of Finance - Mr. M. Szpera.

REPORT

Submitted by: Detective Inspector B. Faudemer.

Date: 8th May, 1999.

Subject: Investigation of Nurse Andrew Charles MAROLIA.

Sir,

This report has been compiled into three separate areas, namely:

1.Evidence which gives rise to concern, relating to the activities of Andrew Charles MAROLIA.

2. The recommended for phase 1 of any investigation.

3. The suggested manpower requirements for conducting such an investigation.

BACKGROUND

On Thursday, 1st April, 1999, Police Officers attended the home address of a female who disclosed that Andrew Charles MAROLIA, a Staff Nurse on Corbiere Ward, had stolen and stored drugs at her home address. The female, an ex-lover of Mr. MAROLIA, produced to the officers, drugs in the form of Valium and Hypnoval, together with a syringe containing clear liquid and several packets of Coproxamol. These have since been identified and their content verified. Hypnoval is more commonly known as a 'date rape' drug. Enquiries confirmed that the drugs were from the hospital and indeed had been sent from the Hospital Pharmacy to Corbiere Ward, where Mr. MAROLIA worked.

A check on the Firearms Register held at Police Headquarters, revealed that Mr. MAROLIA had possession of several firearms, and that his Firearms License had expired in October, 1998. The female who handed the drugs to the Police confirmed that MAROLIA had attended at her premises with a loaded firearm.

Mr. MAROLIA was arrested on returning to the Island on the 17th April, 1999, and, armed with a Warrant, his home address was searched. During the search, the following property was recovered.

1. One lump of brown cannabis resin, tablets and scales.
2. Knuckle-duster.
3. A Police Philips radio (in working order).
4. Bag containing various medications.
5. Eleven syringes with a clear liquid within, and other medication, including
two bottles of potassium chloride.
6. Six firearms, with large quantity of ammunition.
7. One expired Firearms Certificate.

MAROLIA was interviewed concerning the medication found, and at first suggested that the insulin in the eleven syringes was intended as an aid to body-building. He later changed this story, in that he intended to kill himself with the medication, by marching down to the Cenotaph in military dress, where he would inject himself with a lethal dose of insulin and potassium chloride.

He claimed that the medication recovered from his ex-girlfriend's address by the Police, which prompted the investigation, had originated from himself, but that he had taken it to the location by mistake, from Corbiere Ward, having left it in the pocket of his nurse's uniform.

Police Surgeon Dr. Michael HOLMES first expressed concern when he viewed the drugs recovered, in that a combination of insulin and potassium would be very difficult to detect in the body. Added to this, the amount of drugs in the possession of Mr. MAROLIA cast doubt on his account, in that he had several lethal doses of drug. If a person with a serious medical history were to be injected with the combination of drugs found in the possession of MAROLIA, the cause of death would not be clearly apparent. His possession of such drugs was therefore regarded as suspicious.

Enquiries have continued over the last three weeks, and have established that Mr. MAROLIA has had several affairs with either patients or relatives of patients at the General Hospital.

A disturbing disclosure was received from a nurse in the United Kingdom, which will be subject of comment later in this report. The evidence which gives rise to the suspicion that Mr. MAROLIA may have endangered the life of patients is as follows.

Read the full report here
-----
Related links:
Jersey: Corrupt cesspit
AC Associated Content

Eddie, the McCanns sniffer dog, is used to advertise pet insurance


READERS who’ve got a pet can shave more than a whisker off the cost of insurance—thanks to the News of the World's great cashback offer.
The RSPCA recommends you shop around to get the best deal—and there are offers from TEN different insurers to choose from on my cashback site at notwcashback.co.uk
You can get £17.50 cashback plus a 5 per cent discount from Halifax Pet Insurance, who charge from £4.45 per month to insure a cat and from £6.50 per dog. Premiums will vary according to your pet’s age and health.
You can sign up for free now at notwcashback.co.uk to take advantage of these offers.
-----
Source: News of the World / advert

Tony Blair and Gordon Brown's involvement in the Maddie case


It was Tony Blair and Gordon Brown who were behind the instructions given to the UK ambassador, John Buck, and to the British consul, Bill Henderson (the two senior UK diplomats in Portugal at the time she disappeared), to make sure Gerry and Kate McCann were given all possible assistance.

A few minutes after the return to Faro of the team of experts that the PJ had sent to Leicester, Her Majesty's British Ambassador, John Buck, to the Portuguese Republic was already visiting their premises. The presence of the diplomat, that has been confirmed by several journalist, is in direct relation with the Madeleine McCann case and was not asked by the Portuguese Authorities. The ambassador has stayed half an hour with the police.

John Buck - British Ambassador in Portugal in May 2006 - resigns his post on 10/09/07 - shortly after the McCanns are made suspects. John is replaced by Alexander Ellis. Leaves the Diplomatic Services entirely.

Related

Daily Express: Madeleine: British Diplomat had doubts about McCanns
3 December 2007 (no longer on-line)

A British diplomat warned the Foreign Office of concerns regarding Mad­eleine McCann’s parents, it emerged last night. Doubts about Kate and Gerry McCann were raised almost immediately by an official sent to Praia da Luz due to what he considered to be “inconsistencies” in the couple’s testimonies about the night the four-year-old vanished. The warning was contained in a classified document sent from the Algarve to the Foreign Office days after Madeleine’s disappearance. Details of the letter have been leaked through the British diplomatic mission in Brussels to the respected Belgian newspaper Derniere Heure.

The unnamed diplomat voices his concern about the “confused declarations” as to the whereabouts of Kate and Gerry McCann and their friends in the final hours before Madeleine’s disappearance. He also mentions the couple’s “lack of co-operation” with the Portuguese police in the light of instructions from London suggesting consular staff “overstretch their authority and put pressure on the Portuguese authorities”. The document also asks for confirmation of orders sent by the Foreign Office in London the day before, commanding embassy staff to give “all possible assistance to the McCann couple”.

Diplomats on the Algarve were told the McCanns had to be “accompanied at all times during any contact with the Portuguese police” by a member of consular staff or by British police officers sent out from the UK. The letter, sent just days after Madeleine disappeared, warns of the risks of siding with the McCanns so completely. Excerpts published in a report by La Derniere Heure quote the diplomat as saying: “With the greatest respect, I would like to make you aware of the risks and implications to our relationship with the Portuguese authorities, if you consider the possible involvement of the couple. “Please confirm to me, in the light of these concerns, that we want to continue to be closely involved in the case as was requested in your previous ­message.”

A huge team of diplomats have been involved in the case since Gerry McCann asked the Foreign Office for help. In an unprecedented move, the then Prime Minister Tony Blair despatched special envoy Sheree Dodd, a former Fleet Street journalist, to Portugal to act as a “med­ia liaison officer” for the McCann family. Direct government communications with the McCanns came to an abrupt halt, however, when the couple were made official suspects in the case in September.

Portuguese detectives believe it is possible Madeleine died as the result of an accident on May 3 in the family’s holiday apartment and that her parents hid and later disposed of her body with the help of their friends. The couple have always said they had nothing to do with their daughter’s disappearance. The Belgian report says it is highly significant that almost all of the diplomats involved at the outset have now been taken off the case.

Special envoy Sheree Dodd has since resigned from the Foreign Office, the British consul in the Algarve Bill Henderson has retired and the British ambassador to Portugal John Buck is no longer in Portugal. Last night the Foreign Office refused to comment on the report.
----

More information on Joana Morais blog and Duarte Levy
Abuse of Power articles

20/3/09-TV1: Maddie: 60 reasons for 'not being' kidnapped

By Tony Bennett

THE FULL INTERVIEW, WHICH WAS CARRIED OUT BY E-MAIL:

1 - When did Maddie's disappearance first interest you and why?

REPLY: Right from the word 'go', I thought there was something strange about the case. For a start, within the first few days I heard three different versions of how often the McCanns and their friends were checking their children whilst wining and dining - every hour, every half-hour, every 15 minutes.

Further, I couldn't understand how any couple could leave three children aged under four alone whilst having fun with friends 100 metres way. There are so many risks for children of leaving them alone like this.

Then I found it puzzling that having lost one child, they were quite happy to leave their twins in the nursery all day while they spent the day campaigning and arranging press calls and photo opportunities. Surely, I thought, if you had lost one precious child, you would stick like glue to the two children you had left?

Their body language definitely provided another clue for me. Like many others, I could see no real signs of distress. Their television appearances seemed 'staged'. The whole business of jet-setting off to see the Pope and visit the White House seemed to me to be more about public relations than searching for Madeleine.

When we began to hear of cadaver dogs scenting a corpse in the McCanns' apartment and their hired car, and the possibility of blood found in these locations being Madeleine's, I began to take a serious interest in the case.

After the McCanns were made arguidos, and we heard reports of Dr Kate McCann refusing to answer the questions the police put to her, I became increasingly doubtful that this was a case of abduction, as we were being urged to believe. I then began to research the case much more thoroughly.

There appeared to be a great deal of evidence that Madeleine had died and the parents had hidden the body. It was no surprise to me when Goncalo Amaral, the original senior detective in the case, stated publicly his view that Madeleine McCann had died in the McCanns' apartment, probably as the result of an accident.

2 - You tried to prosecute the McCann couple in the United Kingdom and failed. Do you believe one day they will face a trial?

REPLY: As the Portuguese judicial authorities and prosecutor have announced, the investigation into Madeleine's 'disappearance' or death will only continue if they receive new evidence. I personally think that one day that new evidence will appear, sufficient to make it clear what really happened to Madeleine McCann. But it may be a long time coming.

3 - If this happened in the UK do you think the parents would be accused? And if they were a foreign couple in the UK?

REPLY: I think there was a robust, thorough investigation into this case before Goncalo Amaral was removed from the investigation on 2 October 2007, the same as there would have been in the U.K., whether the couple were British or foreign.

I believe the removal of Snr Amaral from the investigation was political, with the British government playing a role in his removal, as he outlines in his book 'A Verdada de Mentira'. My researches suggest that after Amaral was removed, the investigation lost momentum; it was no longer pursued with the same vigour.

4 - Why did you decide to write this book?

REPLY: There were so many lines of evidence that pointed away from Madeleine having been abducted. I found they were being discussed on the internet, but not in British newspapers and media, who seemed to be afraid to criticise the McCanns at all - after they, their friends and Robert Murat collected some 2 million euros in libel damages. I wanted my fellow citizens here in the U.K. to know just how weak the evidence for abduction really is.

5 - What do you expect to achieve giving the MPs the booklet?

REPLY: A British girl aged three has disappeared without trace, and may be presumed dead. No-one has been charged in connection with her disappearance, so the case has not come before a court. If such circumstances occurred in the U.K., we would by now have had a Coroner's Inquest into her disappearance. That is, a special form of judicial enquiry where all relevant witnesses give evidence about what happened.

I believe such an enquiry - in Portugal - would provide the very best way of getting to the truth about Madeleine McCann's disappearance. Our letter asks MPs to demand that our Foreign Secretary seek the co-operation of the Portuguese authorities to hold such a special judicial enquiry into when, why and how she 'disappeared'.

6 - Are you still waiting for an inquest? Do you think it will be possible?

REPLY: I remain hopeful that an inquest will be held in Portugal. I think it is what Madeleine herself is entitled to. Whatever happened to Madeleine was a terrible tragedy. We need to learn the right lessons from it, and if no-one is going to be charged, the holding of a judicial inquiry similar to the Coroner's Inquest in the U.K. would be the best way of learning those lessons.

7 - Do you think Portuguese police failed because they didn't treat the McCanns as suspects in the first days? (They were never under surveillance).

REPLY: I do not know how early the Portuguese police suspected the McCanns of involvement in Madeleine's disappearance. In the introduction to my book, I point out that in nearly every case where a very young child is reported as having been kidnapped from inside their home, it turns out later that the child is dead, due to the neglect, negligence or deliberate act of a family member. Faced with those statistics, any police force anywhere in the world confronted with a claim that an infant has been stolen from inside a house must begin by suspecting the parents of involvement.

8 - Do you think it was a mistake sending the material recovered from the apartment to a British laboratory?

REPLY: Not necessarily. If Portugal didn't have the resources itself, it was right to ask the U.K. police to help, for example by bringing in the highly trained sniffer dogs and using the resources of the British forensics laboratories. It might however have been better to have sent the low copy DNA samples to the Forensic Institute in Rijswijk in the Netherlands, who are world famous for low copy DNA analyses.

There are serious questions now being raised about whether the Forensic Science Service (FSS), which is wholly government owned, were persuaded by the government to modify their forensic findings. The FSS's reputation and credibilty has been seriously damaged in recent years. If it could ever be demonstrated that government influence was successfully brought to bear in this case, the FSS's fragile credibilty would surely be destroyed forever.

9 - You've sent a petition to the government asking for a change in the law. You call it Madeleine's Law. What does it mean? Have you had any answer about it?

REPLY: We believe that one of the main lessons from the Madeleine McCann case is: "Never leave young children on their own" - and that is what we call 'Madeleine's Law'. We started a petition on the Prime Minister's website to make it a criminal offence in the U.K. to leave children under 12 on their own, without reasonable excuse.

We gained 740 signatures. The government by law must reply to any petition which gains 200 or more signatures. We are waiting for their response. Too many young children in the U.K. are left in the house on their own, vulnerable to many risks. We need to tackle this growing problem.

10 - Have you read the book of the Portuguese investigator Gonçalo Amaral?

REPLY: I have read a summary of it on the internet.

11- How is it possible, for two doctors, even possibly being connected to the governing party in Parliament, to have so much power? You believe the UK government had influence in the investigation. In what way?

REPLY: That is a big subject, which I discuss in my book. We know on the record, for example, that in May 2007, when he was Chancellor of the Exchequer, Gordon Brown spoke to the McCanns many times and leaned on the Portuguese police to issue a description of an abductor based solely on the claims of one of the McCanns' frineds to have seen an abductor.

The Chancellor of the Exchequer is supposed to help look after the British economy. Why was he taking such a close personal interest in the case?

We also regard it as highly significant that within days of Madeleine McCann disappearing, the government sent the head of its Media Monitoring Unit, Mr Clarence Mitchell, to oversee the McCanns' public relations. Mitchell himself once boasted: "I was a special adviser to Tony Blair and the Head of the government's Media Monitoring Unit. Forty people work there, and their function is to control whatcomes out in the media".

If this was just about looking for an abducted young girl, why was it necessary to send out, almost immediately, the person who headed the government's propaganda machine? And why did Gordon Brown, then Prime Minister, make a special visit to Leicestershire Police just three days after the McCanns were made arguido and arguida?

12 - Do you think the McCann's will present charge against you because of the booklet?

REPLY: I suppose it's a possiblity. But back on 27 October, I wrote to the McCanns, to three of their sets of lawyers, and to Mr Mitchell, outlining the proposed contents of my book. I offered to change anything in the book if they could demonstrate to me that any statement I made in the book was untrue. Up to now, none of them have replied.

13 - You run a website called Madeleine Foundation. You ask people for contribution to help in the mission of finding the truth. Can you tell how much you collected so far and how it was spent?

REPLY: No problem.

Income so far:

Subscriptions £330

Donations £1,335

Booklet Sales £4,180

TOTAL INCOME: £5,845

Expenses so far:

Website fees £230

Printing of booklets £3,065

Postage and stationery £1,845

Leaflet about Mr Mitchell £180

TOTAL EXPENSES: £5,320

Our current balance is £525, which we have earmarked for publishing a second edition of our booklet.

=========

ENDS

P.S. Three members of 3As helped me with the draft of these replies and I would like to publicly thank them for their valuable help

_________________
The truth is eternal. A lie lasts only until the truth is discovered.
A Verdada de Mentira = The Truth about a Lie
-----
Source: 20/3/09-TV1: Maddie: 60 reasons for 'not being' kidnapped
follow up letter and email to my mp
Abuse of Power articles

McCann and Fritzl linked in media


Posted on March 19, 2009 in Media

Pity the poor Austrians who are trying to come to terms with incestuous rapist and murderer Joseph Fritzl.

They also have Her Majesty’s Media trampling all over the Sachertorte, telling readers, viewers and listeners that these Austrians always have been a pretty rum lot, that Adolf Hitler was an Austrian wasn’t he?

As indeed was Sigmund Freud, so it gets curiouser and curioser.

Half the hacks out there seem to be writing books on the appalling case so you can understand why the Austrians feel both baffled and alarmed.

It’s all a bit like the McCann case, which the media seems to have more or less forgotten except recently when Gerry McCann complained about their behaviour.

Well at least we lead the world in something.
-----

Fritzl case proves long-term missing can re-emerge, say McCanns

* Haroon Siddique and Sadie Gray
* guardian.co.uk, Thursday 1 May 2008 16.44 BST

The parents of Madeleine McCann today insisted they still believe their daughter is alive, and said the case of Josef Fritzl had shown them that even people missing for decades could re-emerge.

Kate and Gerry McCann were speaking as they began a new media campaign in the run-up to the first anniversary of their daughter's disappearance.

The couple had taken hope from the case of Elisabeth Fritzl, the Austrian woman whose father locked her in a cellar beneath his house for 24 years, and fathered seven children with her, said Gerry McCann.

McCann referred to Natascha Kampusch, the Austrian teenager found alive eight years after she was kidnapped by paedophile Wolfgang Priklopil.

"The last thing we would possibly ever want is for Madeleine to become a statistic, a missing child who because of her young age may grow up in another environment and never be recovered," he told Sky News.

He also attacked the "industry" which has sprung up around their plight since Madeleine disappeared from their apartment in Praia da Luz, Portugal, on May 3.

"What happened over the last year was never sustainable and it led to a lot of rumour, myth, innuendo," he said. "There is too much of an industry surrounding it and not enough facts to sustain it."

Earlier the couple said during an interview with GMTV that it was possible only one piece of information might be all it takes to help find the missing four-year-old.

Gerry McCann said their ordeal since May 3 had been "almost unbearable", but that they had been helped through by their young twins, Sean and Amelie.

The McCanns said any parent would understand what they were going through and that they would "go to the ends of the earth" to find Madeleine.

"We're Madeleine's parents — if we're not there for her, who is?" Kate McCann told GMTV.

Her husband said there were nights when he thought "I don't want to wake up tomorrow", but added that they believed a lot could still be done.

"That person [the abductor] is still out there and will probably do this again," he said.

The McCanns responded to criticism that they should not have left Madeleine and her siblings alone while they dined with friends in a nearby tapas bar.

"Everybody parents in a different way … there's no right or wrong, it's just different," Kate McCann said.

"There's been an evil crime committed here, a hideous crime ... it's just so important to concentrate on that. We've got to live with ourselves for that misjudgment, but really the focus should be on that person who's out there."

She said she and her husband, who have not yet decided what to do to mark Saturday's anniversary, would never give up in the search for their daughter.

Source: Guardian
-----
Discussion at the 3 arguidos: Oh dear! McCann And Fritzl Cases Linked In Article 19/3

US millionaire throws down the gauntlet to Gerry McCann with a million dollar challenge


My million dollar challenge to Gerry McCann

A reminder of some facts:

1/ A woman called Gail Cooper was on vacation in Portugal before you even arrived there. She says she saw a man collecting money for charity. Does that make him a child abductor? No. She says she saw a man on the beach when it was raining. Does that make him a child abductor? No. She says the man gave her the "creeps" because of the way he looked. Does that make him a child abductor? No. It means she might need to get out more, but no reason to believe he had anything to do with Madeleine.

2/ One of your vacation chums, Jane Tanner, states she did not see the face of the man she conveniently claims she saw, so I am not going to have you tell me she saw the same man Gail Cooper saw. She plainly would not know if it was the same man, if she had seen the face.

3/ On your website you display two pictures of the man your pal conveniently claims she saw and two pictures of the other man Mrs. Cooper says she saw.

You clearly want all of us to think the man Mrs. Cooper saw is the same as the one your vacation pal claims she saw and you want us to believe he is "Madeleine's probable abductor."

My Challenge

I challenge you to produce compelling evidence that shows Mrs. Cooper's man probably abducted Madeleine. I need either forensic evidence, very strong circumstantial evidence or witness evidence. I don't think you have evidence to prove that Mrs. Cooper's man probably abducted your daughter. You also have no evidence the man your vacation buddy conveniently claims she saw probably abducted Madeleine.

I think it is something you invented and you knowingly had a lie published on your website. Don't pretend you are unaware it is on your website. What parent with a lost child would not look at their own website designed to find their child? I think you are a liar. A controlling man like yourself would know fully well what is on your website.

If I am wrong and you can provide the forensic, strong circumstantial or witness evidence to substantiate your claim that the man probably abducted Madeleine, I will donate $1,000,000 to your fund. You can use that to pay your mortgage in full and take another vacation. Hopefully you will come back this time with as many children and you leave with.

You can either accept my challenge and publish the evidence on your website or decline my challenge and remove your lies from your website. The choice is yours, but the longer your lies remain on your website the more people will become aware you are a liar.

If you cannot accept my challenge, others will ask why not. Others will ask why you have lied. Why have you pretended to the public a man probably abducted Madeleine when you have no evidence to support that claim?

Others will know you are a liar. Others will wonder why you lied. I can only think of one reason why you would lie, because you want to create a smokescreen, a diversion from what really happened.

You are collecting money from the public on your website based on the claim that Mrs. Cooper's man probably abducted Madeleine. If you cannot substantiate that claim and it transpires you have lied, you had better pay every cent back to those you have taken money from, because that would make you both a thief and a liar.


Tom Franks 03/18//09
Discussion at the 3 arguidos: The McCann Million Dollar Challenge - Tom Franks (Merged)

The Judge in the Madeleine McCann case lets murderer go free

by Duarte Levy

Pedro Frias, the judge who has now released a murderer, is the same one who decided to arrest a man over the theft of a mobile phone and to free another one who shot a firearm inside the police station in Portimão. Among so many other cases where Pedro Frias adopted uncommon decisions, there is also the Maddie case, in which he prevented the Polícia Judiciária from accessing and using the McCann couple’s phone taps and text messages.

(to continue)

source: Duarte Levy at Wordpress, 18.03.2009
Translated by astro on Joana Morais blog

Gerry McCann Oral Evidence: The Transcript


Courtesty of Joana Morais: Gerry McCann Oral Evidence: The Transcript

Discussion at the 3 arguidos: Gerry McCann Oral Evidence: The Transcript

Controversial Madeleine Book to be sent to all 646 MPs


PRESS AND MEDIA RELEASE – Tuesday 17 MARCH 2009 1.00am

Controversial Madeleine Book to be sent to all 646 MPs



A booklet which gives details of 60 reasons which suggest that Madeleine McCann was not abducted is being sent this week to all MPs.

The booklet: “What Really Happened to Madeleine McCann? - 60 reasons which suggest she was not abducted” was released in December and has sold 2,000 copies to date, purely online and through word-of-mouth promotion. The McCanns’ spokesman Clarence Mitchell claimed the material in the booklet was libellous when extracts from it were first published on The Madeleine Foundation website on 20 October last year. However, author Tony Bennett wrote to the McCanns, their PR spokesman Clarence Mitchell and three of the McCanns’ many lawyers prior to publication, offering to correct any statement in the booklet that they could demonstrate to be incorrect. Nearly five months later, he has still not received a reply from any of them.


A £1,000 fund for the distribution of the booklet to MPs was raised within 48 hours over the weekend by members of the world’s leading online discussion forum about the Madeleine McCann case - ‘The 3 Arguidos’. Many of its members are concerned parents who fear that all aspects of the case have not been properly investigated.


The Madeleine Foundation shares the view of the original senior detective in the case, Goncalo Amaral, and his team, that Madeleine McCann died in the McCanns’ holiday apartment and her parents then arranged for the body to be hidden. That view is based on a number of strong lines of evidence. Britain’s top sniffer dogs, Eddie and Keela, trained by dog handler Martin Grime, detected the scent of a corpse in nine locations - four in the McCanns’ apartment, two in their hired Renault Scenic car, on two items of clothing belonging to Dr Kate MCCann, one of the children T-shirts, and on the soft pink toy known as ‘Cuddle Cat’. Dr Kate McCann refused to answer any of 48 questions put to her by the Portuguese police and the McCanns refused to attend a reconstruction the Portuguese police wanted to hold last spring.

Chairman of the Madeleine Foundation, Debbie Butler, said: “We’re grateful for the terrific response of dozens of members of the 3 Arguidos Forum, who raised the money for the distribution to MPs in just two days. There are many people all over the world who have been touched by the plight of Madeleine McCann, and who do not believe she was abducted. Our book gives a concise explanation of all the lines of evidence which point away from the McCanns’ claim of abduction. We are calling for there to be a public inquiry or inquest in Portugal into all the circumstances surrounding Madeleine’s ‘disappearance’. Our letter asks MPs to support our demand”


FURTHER INFORMATION & CONTACTS:

A translation of ‘60 Reasons’ in Spanish is on the Madeleine Foundation website, and a Dutch translation is also complete. Substantial parts of the booklet have already been translated into German and French.

We will be happy to supply a copy of the booklet “What Really Happened to Madeleine McCann?” on request to any editor or journalist.

Chairman: Debbie Butler - 07867 887066

Secretary: Tony Bennett - 01279 635789 and 07835 716537

Madeleine Foundation: http://www.madeleinefoundation.org/

3 Arguidos: http://www.the3arguidos.net/


"What really happened to Madeleine McCann? - 60 Reasons which suggest she was not abducted", (60pp) available £3 direct from me or £4 via PayPal on this Madeleine Foundation link: http://madeleinefoundation.org/main/our-book/
-----
Discussion at the 3 arguidos: BBC News 60 reasons book


Not all employees of Leicester hospital are fooled by the McCanns

Cadaver dogs: A nose for crime


Sometimes the only difference between justice served and justice denied is one black, wet nose
Video link here

PeterMac's Free e-book: What really happened to Madeleine McCann?

Gonçalo Amaral's 'Maddie: Truth of the Lie

Richard D. Hall: 'When Madeleine Died?'

Richard D. Hall: 'When Madeleine Died?'
Please click on image to view all three Madeleine films

Prime Minister introduces Prime Suspect to Royalty

Prime Minister introduces Prime Suspect to Royalty

Popular Posts

Followers

Follow by Email

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *