Jail for home alone death mother


A mother whose 22-month-old daughter died in a house fire after being left alone has been jailed for seven-and-a-half years.

Michelle Brown, 37, of Oxford Street, Hillfields, Coventry, was convicted of causing or allowing the girl's death and perverting the course of justice.

Jodie Ann Brown died of smoke inhalation after an electrical fire broke out at her home on 15 July.

Her mother was known to social services, Coventry Crown Court heard.

She was sentenced to six years in prison for causing or allowing her daughter's death and 18 months for perverting the course of justice. The sentences are to run consecutively.

'Small mercy'

Judge Peter Ross told Brown she had deliberately put Jodie Ann in the rear upstairs bedroom "where she could not wander or attract attention".

He said: "The heavy fire door was closed so that any crying, screaming, or moving about would not be spotted by any passers by."

He added that "the only mercy" was that Jodie would have gone quietly in her sleep.

He said it was "very far from the first time" Brown had left any of her children alone.

Coventry City Council said the case had deeply affected Brown's other children.

It said it was waiting for the results of a serious case review later this month.

Trapped upstairs

The court heard how Brown had been attending a county court hearing when the fire broke out.

It was a family hearing concerning one of her other children.

Brown has three children living in England and two more in her native Jamaica.

The trial was told Jodie Ann was left trapped in an upstairs bedroom for up to three hours.

The two-week trial heard how Jodie Ann was in the unventilated room when a "slow, smouldering fire" broke out.

When Brown arrived home she was filmed by CCTV cameras carrying her daughter in her arms.

She eventually phoned an ambulance from a nearby hairdresser's, but her daughter was declared dead later.

In the moments after the fire, Brown made several calls on her mobile phone asking friends to lie for her and claim they had been looking after Jodie Ann in her absence.

-----
Source: BBC News
3 arguidos: One Rule For One.........

Kate and Gerry's friends lied for them and were paid £375,000

Robert Murat at Cambridge Union Hall

Robert Murat watched closley by security as he circulates in the Cambridge Union hall


Thursday, 05 Mar 2009 20:31

Robert Murat has delivered a scathing attack on the journalists who defamed him over the abduction of Madeleine McCann, saying he felt "like a fox being pursued by a pack of hounds".

Mr Murat won undisclosed libel damages for defamatory claims made by 11 national newspapers about Madeleine, whose disappearance and suspected abduction in a Portuguese holiday resort dominated headlines over the summer of 2007.

Tonight, addressing an audience of students at Cambridge University's Union Society, Mr Murat described in detail for the first time the "horror story" of being pursued by journalists.

During his speech Mr Murat explained how he blamed a specific unnamed journalist, who was "so anxious, it appeared, to break a story that she literally created her own".

"To my personal cost, I now know what the maxim 'never let the truth get in the way of a good story' really means," he said.

"Over a period of many months, day after day, a torrent of outlandish, untrue, and deeply hurtful allegations about me were systematically splashed across the pages of British newspapers.

"I was one day said to be a sexual predator, another day a kidnapper; the tabloids reported apparently that I had been outside the McCann flat on the night Madeleine went missing, with her DNA apparently found in my home.

"They even came up with a story that I had a secret chamber under the floor of the house. Fairytales. Every single one of them, as the police themselves concluded."

Mr Murat argued against the motion that 'tabloids do more harm than good', describing them as a "travesty" and a "force for harm".

"My own life will be scarred for ever by the lies they printed," he added.

Media litigation lawyer Louis Charalambous, Mr Murat's lawyer of Simon, Muirhead and Burton, said his former client had had his "reputation destroyed" by the press.

He said: "Although Mr Murat's good name has now been rightfully restored and he and his family have begun rebuilding their life, the intolerable distress and stress they experienced as a result of such malicious reporting to benefit ad revenues and market share, is a shameful episode in the history of the British press."

Other speakers at the Union debate included Liberal Democrat MP Lembit Opik, former Endemol chairman Peter Bazalgette and Guardian assistant editor Michael White.

Madeleine was three when she disappeared from her parents Kate and Gerry McCann's holiday villa in Praia da Luz.

Mr and Mrs McCann, as well as Mr Murat, were named as arguidos - official suspects - by Portuguese police, who dropped the investigation into Madeleine's disappearance last year.

A team of private investigators hired by Mr and Mrs McCann, from Rothley, Leicestershire, is still trying to locate Madeleine.

-----
Source: Inthenews.co.uk
BBC News

Press Gazette

-----
Discussions at the 3 arguidos:
COMMENTS FROM MURAT'S CAMBRIDGE UNION ADDRESS- 5 March

Madeleine media coverage questioned


Lori Campbell: British authorities gave Kate McCann a police manual

Lori Campbell lied about Robert Murat

Justine McGuinness to sue The People for libel

5 March 2009

By Sarah Limbrick

Public relations expert Justine McGuinness, who acted for Kate and Gerry McCann's Find Madeleine Fund, is suing Mirror Group Newspapers for libel damages.

McGuinness, who spent three months working as a communications strategist for the fund, is suing over a story in The People in October 2007 which she said was defamatory.

The front page story, headed: "Woman who cost Maddie fund £51k" was also published on the paper's website.

In her writ, McGuinness said the story suggested she had deliberately ripped off the Find Madeleine Fund by overcharging the McCanns for expenses to which she was not entitled and inflating her overtime.

She said the story claimed that, because of this, she was immediately forced to quit by the fund, although she had persuaded the McCanns to conceal this as the true reason for the end of her employment.

McGuinness, who runs Pineapple Consultants, said the story seriously injured her reputation and caused her considerable hurt, distress and embarrassment.

She said the allegations struck at the heart of her personal and professional reputation, casting serious doubt on her honesty and integrity, and were deeply offensive to her as they accused her of "cheating" a worthwhile and high-profile cause.

The writ claimed that, as a result of the story, the allegations were repeated in other media, and on the internet.

McGuinness said although she had written a letter of complaint to the paper, The People had refused to apologise or provide any correction, which has increased the injury to her feelings.

Now McGuinness is seeking damages and aggravated damages for libel and an injunction banning repetition of the original allegations about her.
-----
Source: Press Gazette

Justine silenced by lawyers

-----

Discussion at the 3 arguidos:

Madeleine fund PR sues The people for libel/5.3.09

Duarte Levy about The People - A must read !!!

Ethical Journalism campaign promoted through new web site

Question for Tony Bennett

Kate and Gerry sued all and sundry for libel

Murat sued for libel

The Tapas 7 sued for libel


-----

Maybe the Portuguese police would also like to sue The People over this article MADDIE COPS TOTALLY CLUELESS

EXCLUSIVE Brit detectives' verdict.. and flaws in inquiry

By Rachael Bletchly

The Portuguese police hunting Madeleine McCann have been branded "Keystone Cops" by British officers shocked at their appalling blunders.

Detectives from Leicestershire are said to be horrified that clues which could have led to the tot's abductors have probably been lost forever.

The British cops, drafted in to review the three-month investigation, were stunned by the "incompetence, inaccuracy and crass inefficiency" they found.


A source close to the team said the officers had been "tearing their hair out in frustration and disbelief" at basic errors which have hindered the search for four-year-old Maddie.

He told The People: "The Portuguese investigation has been a total shambles. Our guys were left shaking their heads at every turn asking: 'Why the hell did they do that...why didn't they do this?' "They are shocked, disappointed and p***** off by what they've found because basic procedures were not followed.

"Local police appear to have been running around like the Keystone Cops without any proper co-ordination."

The source added: "Crucial clues may have been lost and valuable hours were wasted.

The McCanns' apartment was scrubbed out and occupied by new tenants only five weeks after Madeleine disappeared and the inquiry was supposedly still highly active. When our guys arrived after 13 weeks they had to go back to square one - except square one had been trampled over with size 11 boots."

The Portuguese investigators came under fire within hours of Maddie's disappearance in Praia da Luz on May 3 for failing to seal off the area, start house-to-house enquiries and alert border guards.

Officers leading the hunt have even been criticised by local journalists over their long lunches and apparently laid-back attitude.

Police chief Guilhermino Encarnacao, 59, was dubbed Inspector Clueless.

He has refused to comment in public about the case since the second day after Maddie vanished. When no progress was made in the inquiry after three months, detectives from the Judicial Police invited specialists from Leicestershire to fly out to review the case. Maddie's parents, doctors Gerry and Kate, are from Rothley in the county.

The British team included a forensics expert and a Crackerstyle criminal profiler.

Within days they found specks of blood on the walls and curtains of the holiday apartment where Maddie had been left sleeping.

The potentially-crucial evidence, missed by Portuguese police, has now been analysed in a British lab.

Preliminary findings show the blood is that of a white European man - most likely one of the holidaymakers who moved in weeks after Maddie vanished.

A full report is expected next week but experts say the blood sample is only 72 per cent accurate as it was contaminated with detergent used to clean the flat.

Despite the scientists' caution Portuguese police jumped the gun last weekend by announcing they had new clues and developments that pointed to Maddie being dead.

And police spokesman Olegario Sousa bragged: "Never has there been so much evidence collected in a crime scene by specialised teams.

"Every single detail is being examined very carefully. We spent four days in the past week or two inside the apartment."

But the British police source said: "When he says 'We' I think he means Portuguese officers led by British experts.

"And if there was still so much evidence to be had you have to ask what could have been found in the first 24 hours."

The shambles piles more anguish on Kate and Gerry McCann who - 108 days on - are still praying for their daughter's return.

Not likely though is it?

Gerry McCann to give evidence at Press Standards Inquiry


Max Mosley to give evidence to press standards inquiry
5 March 2009

By Paul McNally

Max Mosley, the motorsport boss at the centre of a tabloid sting operation last year, is to appear before MPs next week to give his views on libel law and privacy.

The FIA chairman has been called to give evidence on Tuesday morning to the cross-party culture, media and sport select committee, as part of its wide-ranging investigation into press standards.

Mosley won £60,000 in compensation from the News of the World last July after the Sunday tabloid published photos and a video of what it claimed was a "sick Nazi orgy" with five prostitutes.

High court judge Mr Justice Eady said Mosley had a "reasonable expectation of privacy in relation to sexual activities" and said there was no evidence of Nazi re-enactment.

The sum awarded was the highest ever given in a UK privacy case, dwarfing the £14,600 awarded to Michael Douglas and Catherine Zeta Jones from Hello magazine.

Mosley is now asking the European Court of Human Rights to strengthen privacy laws - and make it a requirement for newspapers to approach the subject of a story before publication.

According to yesterday's London Evening Standard, Gerry McCann - the father of Madeleine, who disappeared on holiday in Portugal in 2007 - will also give evidence to the select committee next week.

Gerry and Kate McCann accepted a £550,000 libel payout from Express Newspapers last April for a series of more than 100 articles which Mr Justice Eady said were "seriously defamatory".

The Daily Express, Daily Star and their Sunday sister titles all published prominent front-page apologies for the untrue allegations, which the McCanns' lawyer said suggested they "were responsible for the death of Madeleine".

A Commons spokeswoman said McCann's appearance before the committee had "not yet been confirmed".
-----
Source: Press Gazette
-----

Joana Morais: Robert Murat, former arguido in the Maddie Case joins tabloid press debate
NUJ SUBMISSIONS ON MCCANN CASE TO SELECT COMMITTEE


Don't forget to mention this evidence Gerry

-----
A few comments on The 3 Arguidos: Perhaps G. McCann give evidence to selected comittee/5.3.09

To me this is incredibly worrying. The McCanns are always going on about the 'wider agenda' - is that wider agenda complete governmental control over the citizens of the UK and an erosion of any democratic rights?
The government now tell us what to eat, where to go, where to smoke, what we can read....where will it end?
ID cards will soon be telling quangos where we shop, what we buy, we will be like prisoners of the free world.

The big question in my mind was, were the McCanns aware of the wider agenda before MM went missing, or was this seen as the perfect vehicle to use as action 1 by Blair / Brown - to silence the free press?
-----
Is there no end to the McCann publicity machine!!!!!! Mosley received £60,000 damages for a far more damaging intrusion
on his private life, the McCanns received nearly ten times more for libellous accusations which were not nearly so damaging
given that we still don"t know what happened to Madeleine.

It will be interesting to see whether they do attend, my guess is they won"t .
-----
It's strange this, because it's not the press that Gerry McCann is worried about.
Because the press, to a man, have willingly bent over forwards for Gerry McCann at every opportunity.
OK, there was the Express thingy, but they bent over forwards when threatened with the courts.

Could it be that, during his visit to the select committee, he might just be heard to say: "Oh, and while I'm here, could you do something about those naughty people on the internet?"

ETA - I hope they give him as much of a grilling as poor David Kelly got ...
-----


Question for Tony Bennett

Tony's response:

"We need to deal with one other matter. One person whom we believe was seriously libelled by many sections of the British press was the Senior Investigating Officer in the case, Snr Goncalo Amaral. He was frequently described in sections of the British press as a ‘disgraced cop’. The reason for this was partly over claims that he was removed from the Madeleine McCann enquiry because of unwarranted criticisms of the British government, but more because he was being accused of having ordered his officers to beat a confession out of Leonor Cipriano, the convicted murderess of her own daughter (see paragraph 15 above). At the time of submitting our report to the Select Committee, Snr Amaral is on trial in respect of this allegation in the court at Faro. He is thus innocent until proven guilty. To call Snr Amaral ‘the disgraced cop’ on the basis of this allegation was no better than if the British press had referred to ‘the disgraced McCanns’ after they were made suspects. In fact, the court proceedings in Faro are indicating, as many believed, that there is no substance to these allegations. We cannot really say more, as the proceedings have been mysteriously adjourned several times and are not yet concluded. If, as we expect, Snr Amaral is exonerated, we trust that those sections of the British press who have labelled him ‘the disgraced cop’ will have the decency to apologise and correct their statements. That is a matter that may yet come before the Press Complaints Commission. "

PRESS RELEASE FROM THE MADELEINE FOUNDATION

Released 12.30AM Thursday 5 March

A group of members and supporters of The Madeleine Foundation (www.madeleinefoundation.org) will hand out leaflets at the Oxford Union this Friday, in protest at the role of Clarence Mitchell as PR spokesman for the McCann family.

1,000 leaflets have alreday been handed out to Oxford students and Madeleine Foundation members will hand out further leaflets to students as they enter the Oxford Union building to hear Mitchell at 8.30pm this Friday.

The leaflet is reproduced in full below. It ifeatures 21 items of concern about Mr Mitchell's statements and actions on behalf of the McCanns. Photos of Madeleine Foundation members leafletting in Oxford can be viewed on the '3Arguidos' internet forum here:

http://the3arguidos.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=28853

Secretary of the Madeleine Foundation, Tony Bennett, has written a 64-page booklet on the Madeleine McCann case called "What Really Happened to Madeleine McCann? - 60 Reasons Which Suggest she was not Abducted". It has sold 2,000 copies since being released in December - and has been transalted into Spanish, Dutch, German and French. Students attending the Mitchell event will be offered copies of the booklet.

Members of the Madeleine Foundation share the view of the original senior investigating officer in the case, Goncalo Amaral, that Madeleine McCann died in the McCanns' apartment in Praia da Luz and the parents, possibly helped by others, hid her body to avoid an inquest.

FURTHER INFORMATION

Debbie Butler, Chairman, 07867 887066
Tony Bennett, Secretary, 01279 635789 or 07835 716537

"What really happened to Madeleine McCann? - 60 Reasons which suggest she was not abducted", (60pp) available £3 direct from me or £4 via PayPal on this Madeleine Foundation link: http://madeleinefoundation.org/main/our-book/

Twatman and Knobin



Robert Murat's FIRST speech - to be recorded by ITN


By Tony Bennett, The Madeleine Foundation

Information received from a source in Cambridge University.

The Madeleine Foundation does not plan to attend; is anyone else on this Forum able to go? [Cambridge Union members only allowed - same rules as Oxford Union]:

CAMBRIDGE UNION DEBATE - THURSDAY 5TH MARCH

The Cambridge Union invites you to join us in what is Robert Murat's first-ever public speech, and what should be an extremely lively debate, to be covered by ITN.

DEBATE: This house believes that tabloids do more harm than good

Speakers include:

Proposition:

Robert Murat - successful litigant against British newspapers after being falsely accused of being involved in the abduction of Madeleine McCann. Speaking with...

Louis Charalambous, lawyer at Simons Muirhead and Burton.

Michael White - Assistant Editor and columnist, The Guardian

Lembit Opik - Liberal Democrat MP and tabloid staple. Complains to the PCC every time a newspaper says that he dumped Sian Lloyd (she dumped him).

Opposition:

Murray Morse - Editor in Chief, Sport Newspapers

Peter Bazalgette - former Chief Creative Officer of Endemol, who brought Big Brother and Deal or No Deal to the UK. Said to be the man who has 'done more to debase television' than anyone. Former President, Cambridge Union Society.

[NOTE: Kelvin MacKenzie, former editor of 'The Sun', was originally billed to appear for the opposition but his name does not appear on the latest Cambridge Union inforamtion sheet]
-----
Source: Tony Bennett at the 3 arguidos: Robert Murat's FIRST speech - to be recorded by ITN
Joana Morais: Robert Murat, former arguido in the Maddie Case joins tabloid press debate

Clarence 'It's my job to control what comes out in the media' Mitchell builds his career on Maddie McCann


28 MAY 2009

THE CUMBERLAND HOTEL, MAYFAIR LONDON
http://www.prontheedge.com
A Day & Evening Event
Evening Debate:
“The PR Industry’s Reputation:
Is Its Importance Overrated?”

Bringing you an outstanding line-up of over 25 speakers including:

Clarence Mitchell, PR for the McCann Family and Consultant Freud Communications

Julia Hobsbawm, CEO Editorial Intelligence
-----
Discussion at the 3 arguidos:
WATCH OUT! Clarenzio Is On The Prowl For PR Work............
Clarence Mitchell: The PR equivalent of an angel of death
Clarence Mitchell: An ongoing profile (including bloopers and outtakes)
The marketing ploys of Gerry McCann

What do readers of the Independent really think of Clarence 'I'm a decent human being even if I do say so myself' Mitchell?

British newspapers don't normally allow comments about the People's Child Neglecters, Kate and Gerry McCann - no sooner do people try to exercise their rights of Freedom of Speech than the comments are whooshed quicker than a swarthy predator can escape through a jemmied window. So before people complain "They've taken them", here are the saved comments from the article "Clarence Mitchell: 'I am a decent human being. If I can help them, I will' published in The Independent on Sunday 1 March :
Independent Live Journal

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Direct links to comments for easier viewing:
http://i716.photobucket.com/albums/ww165/abuseofpower/comments1-1.jpg
http://i716.photobucket.com/albums/ww165/abuseofpower/comments2-1.jpg
http://i716.photobucket.com/albums/ww165/abuseofpower/comments3-1.jpg
http://i716.photobucket.com/albums/ww165/abuseofpower/comments4-1.jpg
http://i716.photobucket.com/albums/ww165/abuseofpower/comments5-1.jpg
http://i716.photobucket.com/albums/ww165/abuseofpower/comments6-1.jpg

Discussions at the 3 arguidos:
UNEXPURGATED Independent readers views on Clarence Mitchell
Clarence Mitchell:'I am a decent human being" Sun Mar 1 Ind
Madeleine Foundation Supporter’s Triumph For Justice
WATCH OUT! Clarenzio Is On The Prowl For PR Work............
Inquest for Madeleine: now to For. Office & Min. of Justice

Inquest for Madeleine McCann: "You may well have a case"



By Tony Bennett, The Madeleine Foundation

A civil servant who has asked not to be named has spoken to us at The Madeleine Foundation.

She has pointed out that the Attorney-General's Department has a limited remit and role in terms of the holding of Inquests.

In discussing our case that a British girl and British citizen who may be assumed dead as the result of an abduction or other incident abroad should be entitled to an Inquest (or otjher judical enquiry) in the country where she may have died, rather than in the U.K., she conceded: "You may well have a case".

She advised that letters be sent to both the Foreign Office and the Ministry of Justice, setting out our case for the Portuguese authorities to be formally approached by the relevant British authorities to ensure that - if a criminal charge is not going to be brought against anyone in respect of Madeleine's disappearance - there should nevertherless be an Inquest or other judical enquiry into the circumstances of Madeleine's assumed/presumed death.

So we will now make that approach to both the Foreign Office and the Ministry of Justice.
-----

Posted on the 3 arguidos: Inquest for Madeleine: now to For. Office & Min. of Justice

Clarence Mitchell: Master media manipulator

Tony Bennett and Helene Davies-Green outside the Oxford Union building


OXFORD UNION: Friday 6th March

On 6th March 2009, at the Oxford Union, one of the invited speakers is Clarence Mitchell. Who is this man, and what is his track record?

THE SAYINGS OF CLARENCE MITCHELL - A MASTER MEDIA MANIPULATOR

Carlos Anjos, head of the Portuguese police professional association, who had dealings with Clarence Mitchell, said of him: “He lies with as many teeth as he has in his mouth”.

Clarence Mitchell in his own words, on 29 September 2007 to Espresso: “I was the head of the government's Media Monitoring Unit. Forty people work there and their function is to control what comes out in the media."

CLARENCE MITCHELL’S CAREER

Clarence Mitchell’s media career began in the late 1980s as a BBC regional reporter in Leeds. He moved to London where for a while he covered stories about the Royals. A 2007 article on the BBC website by Laurie Margolis about Clarence Mitchell’s BBC career says: “Clarence was also a presenter on various BBC news programmes, and may have been looking to make that his main career. But the presenting world is a precarious and capricious one, and he never quite made it. Once, I was working throughout the night. Clarence was presenting hourly bulletins on BBC News 24. He did the 1am, and the 2am, but at 3am a slightly dishevelled looking producer appeared doing the news. It turned out Clarence closed his eyes, sleeping through the 3am bulletin. Clarence left the BBC suddenly, making a move into the Labour government as Director of its Media Monitoring Unit [Central Office of Information]. There, his job was to ‘correct’ bad media stories about the government and to put out the government line”. A ‘spinner’, as some would call it, or ‘a professional liar’ as others describe the role. In May 2007 he was suddenly seconded to the Foreign Office to work for the McCanns’ public relations team, alongside their own spokeswoman Justine McGuiness. In September 2007, in an unusual move, he was allowed to resign from the civil service to become the McCanns’ full-time spokesman, on £75,000 a year. He remains in that role, though he has been employed for the last few months by another PR agency, Freud International.

‘AN ANGEL OF DEATH’

Margolis also noted Clarence Mitchell’s strange association with controversial murder cases: “He was closely involved with the Fred and Rosemary West case, where a murderous couple had killed young girls and buried the bodies under their patio in Gloucester. He was one of the first reporters to arrive at Gowan Avenue, Fulham in south west London, when the immensely popular BBC TV presenter Jill Dando was shot dead in a murder many feel has never been satisfactorily explained”. Mitchell also covered in depth the arrest and conviction of mass-murderer Dennis Nilson. When Paula Yates’ partner Michael Hutchance died in mysterious circumstances in the Ritz Carlton Hotel in Sydney, Australia, in 1999, Clarence Mitchell was despatched to cover the death; more recently, in a story he worked on right up to the day he left the BBC, Clarence led coverage of the murder of the Surrey schoolgirl Millie Dowler in 2002. The case has never been solved. Mitchell has also written books on the Fred & Rosemary West and Jill Dando cases. He also reported extensively on the murder by Ian Huntley of Soham girls Jessica Chapman and Holly Wells. On 9 January this year, the Independent ran a brief article titled: ‘Remember Clarence Mitchell?’ It said:

“Clarence Mitchell, formerly of the BBC and now spokesman for Madeleine McCann’s parents, has developed a nice little niche as a spin doctor of misery. First he took on Fiona MacKeown, mother of teenager Scarlet Kelling, who was murdered in Goa. Then he started representing the parents of murdered London teenager Jimmy Mizen. And today we’ve discovered that Mr Mitchell is also speaking for the wife of Jeremy Hoyland, the British jet skier who went missing off the coast of Bali last October. Mr Mitchell is not charging for his services. But his presence can hardly be reassuring - the PR equivalent of an angel of death”.

CLARENCE MITCHELL & THE MADELEINE McCANN CASE

Clarence Mitchell has achieved much in the Madeleine McCann case. He played the key role in arranging for the McCanns to meet the Pope on 28 May 2007, just 25 days after Madeleine McCann was reported missing. A man with connections at the highest level, Clarence Mitchell openly boasted in a TV interview that it was he who arranged, via Roman Catholic Archbishop Cormac Murphy O’Connor, for the McCanns to visit the Pope - in what was a highly publicised visit.

The Pope put pages of material about the McCanns and Madeleine on his website. But two days before the McCanns were made arguidos - ‘provisional suspects’ - in September 2007, the Pope wiped all references to Madeleine from his website. Margolis wrote in 2007: “I would imagine Clarence is content in his new role as the family's voice. He's centre stage on a huge story, intimately involved as ever, and on television and in the papers all the time. It was extraordinary how, last week, his intervention seemed to eliminate within hours any misgiving about the McCanns in the British media”.

Who has been paying Clarence Mitchell’s salary whilst he has been working for the McCanns?

This remains a mystery. We know that up to September 2007, the British government paid his salary. He left the government that month. Since then, the McCanns and Mitchell have said on the record that the ‘Helping to Find Madeleine Fund’ has not paid any part of his salary. They say that he was paid by ‘an anonymous backer’. But Clarence Mitchell won’t say who that backer is, nor why that backer is giving him so much support. [UPDATE: In an article in the Independent on Sunday, 1 March 2009, Mitchell has contradicted previous claims that his salary was being paid by an anonymous backer. He now says he gets a retainer of £28,000 a year from the Helping to Find Madeleine Fund, donations to which were given to ‘help find Madeleine’, not pay the salaries of PR professionals].

The full article can be read here: Copy of Clarence Mitchell leaflet for Oxford Union, 6 March
Clarence Mitchell: An Ongoing Profile

Clarence Mitchell is a decent human being - says Clarence Mitchell


Clarence Mitchell: 'I am a decent human being. If I can help them, I will'

The ex-BBC journalist built a career on professional detachment. Then, he went to work for the McCanns

Cole Morton
Sunday, 1 March 2009

The search goes on. "There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever, nothing, to suggest that Madeleine has been harmed, let alone killed," insists Clarence Mitchell, the former television reporter who speaks for the family of the most famous missing girl in the world. Her face is instantly recognisable. There is no longer any need to use her surname, McCann. And yet, nearly two years since she vanished from the Algarve, there is still no trace.

This is hard to say to Mitchell – who began as a dispassionate adviser and then became a close personal friend of her parents – but there seems no evidence to suggest the three-year-old is still living. "Obviously," he says, "as time goes on, Kate and Gerry are finding it harder and harder. But they are still firmly of the view that Madeleine is alive and out there to be found."


Bodily fluids found in McCanns hire car 23 days later

For months now they have turned down interviews, preferring to go through the many files handed over by the Portuguese police. There is another reason for their silence, too. "You reach a saturation point," their spokesman admits. "People would say to us, 'Oh, it's tragic, but we've almost had enough of Madeleine.' That was appalling to hear."

In their silence, Clarence Mitchell is re-emerging as a public figure in his own right. On Friday he will speak at the Oxford Union, following in the footsteps of Desmond Tutu, Mother Teresa and Kermit the Frog. Now he is giving his first personal interview since the days when he was a familiar face on the BBC. He is doing it at the West End offices of Freud Communications, which has hired him as a consultant. Dressed as if to broadcast, in a light brown suit and dark blue shirt, he has two BlackBerrys on his desk: one for Kate and Gerry, the other for everyone else.

Lately, he seems to be setting himself up as a public relations guru for families in distress, including that of 16-year-old Jimmy Mizen, who was stabbed to death in south London last year. The trial of Jimmy's alleged killer begins at the Old Bailey a week tomorrow, and Mitchell will be outside, representing the bereaved parents. Once again, he will be on our screens. But despite seeming so familiar, Clarence Mitchell has never really given anything away about himself. Why did he stop reporting and reading the news? What then drove this 46-year-old man to campaign on behalf of the McCanns, a couple he barely knew and who were suspected of murdering their daughter?

"Everything I have seen of them, in all of the pressurised situations, shows me a family who are suffering the loss of their child," he says. "Everything they are doing, behind the scenes, convinces me of that."


So far, so on message for a man who was hired in September 2007 to "salvage their reputations" in the wake of the McCanns being named as arguidos, or suspects, by the Portuguese police. Mitchell had already been with them for a month, as a civil service media expert sent to help the couple to cope with all the attention. But he returned in the pay of a millionaire supporter of the McCanns, leading a publicity campaign "to correct and balance the inaccurate coverage that was coming out and try to get everything back on an even keel ... with a view to helping to get arguido lifted".

It worked, of course: they won £550,000 damages and a front-page apology from the Daily Express, and last summer the police cleared them of all suspicion. But Mitchell could not have known it would turn out that way. "It was," he says, "gut instinct."

It was a life-changing moment. Until then, his entire career had been built on remaining calm and uninvolved in the most trying circumstances: reporting for the Hendon and Finchley Times with the local MP, Margaret Thatcher, bursting into the office; broadcasting from the M1 with the wreckage of the Kegworth air disaster strewn in front of him; covering wars in Northern Ireland, Kuwait, Iraq and the Balkans alongside the likes of Kate Adie. "You see a lot of distressing things, whether that's a war zone or a murder scene, but I have always found it relatively easy to be dispassionate."

He needed that skill most when sent on a story in Fulham in 1999. "There was a rumour that Jill Dando had been in some sort of accident. The area was taped off. There were detectives walking up from the house who told us to ring the press bureau. I said, 'Look, I know Jill.' We were friends. She used to called me Clarenzio. They said, 'She's dead, I'm afraid.' It was dreadful." But he still filed reports from the scene. "You just have to get on with it."

He did breakfast TV and the odd Six O'Clock News – "which nobody remembers" – but by the time he left the BBC in 2005, his career had reached a plateau. "I felt I had more to offer." Recruited by the Cabinet Office to run the Media Monitoring Unit, he had a hard first week. "The Monday was the G8 at Gleneagles. I was just about getting my head round the job on Tuesday, then Wednesday we won the Olympics. Thursday was 7/7." When the Foreign Office sent him to assist the McCanns – as he insists it would have helped any family in that situation – he asked difficult questions. "I was assured that from the perspective of the British authorities, this was a rare case of stranger abduction."

They had left their very young children alone in a holiday apartment while they went to a tapas bar. He doesn't duck that, even if the response has been smoothed by repetition. "They made a mistake at the time; they weren't with her when it happened. They will always regret that, God forbid, possibly for the rest of their lives."

In media terms, he says, Madeleine was "a perfect storm: her age, her appearance, the location, the parents..." Columnists wrote about "people like us". Picture editors loved Kate, to an extraordinary degree. "It would be sad if it wasn't laughable: Kate was finding herself in Nuts or whatever lads' magazine's top 10. You think, 'This is ridiculous.' But they can't help how they look."

There's no truth, then, in the report that he tried to get Kate to be photographed in a swimsuit?

"Utter b*llocks." Gerry suggested it without realising the implications, he says, and was then persuaded otherwise. "A good example of facts being distorted. Completely, 180-degree wrong."

Mitchell had a home in Bath with his wife and children, two girls and a boy who were aged 10, eight and one at the time. Why go back to Portugal? "We had become friends. There was an emotional drive. I felt they had been the victims of a heinous crime and very badly wronged in the way stories had appeared."

There was also his response as a father. "I have never had to analyse it like this before ... but yes, this was every parent's nightmare, my own included." Didn't he miss his own children? "At night, when I had a few hours to myself, you did miss them more acutely, perhaps, than if it had been a job of a different nature."

These days Mitchell gets 40 per cent of his former salary as a retainer from the Find Madeleine Fund. Kate is said by relatives to spend hours with the files at home in Rothley, Leicestershire, while her twins are at nursery. Gerry, devotes evenings to the case, after days as a consultant at Glenfield Hospital.

"Sadly, the files have not revealed any substantial new leads," says Mitchell. "And sadly, they have confirmed a lot of what Kate and Gerry feared: that things haven't been done properly in certain areas, and certain things hadn't been followed up." The detective agencies they hired are no longer on the case. Have a dozen British former detectives and security service agents been employed instead, as reported? "I can't go into details, because the investigators don't wish me to. The investigation is on a smaller scale, but just as relevant."

There is still a huge amount of material to work through: such as more than 3,000 "psychic tip-offs. Any verifiable fact in them – and some are very detailed – has to be checked".

Meanwhile, his new life involves media training for corporations as well as advising people such as the mother of Scarlett Keeling, who was murdered in Goa, and the Mizens. "I do it pro bono, for free." Why? "Because these people came to me in the direst of situations, with their children dead. I'm not going to say no. Nor am I going to say, 'I'm sorry about your loss. Here's my fee.'" Others would. "It's a non-starter. I am a decent, caring human being. If I can help them, I will."

Yes, but isn't he using this free work to build the kind of reputation that made him attractive to Freud? "Not deliberately so. Honestly." Others have compared the new Clarence Mitchell to a more obviously compassionate Max Clifford, with whom he says he gets on well. "People are entitled to their point of view," he says, as calmly as he says everything, on and off camera. "But I am doing this for what I believe to be honest, genuine, compassionate reasons."

-----
Source: The Independant on Sunday
A better version of this post with photo's can be found on Joana Morais

Discussion at the 3 arguidos: Clarence Mitchell:'I am a decent human being" Sun Mar 1 Ind
-----
Related links:
Clarence Mitchell: Ongoing Profile



-----

The 'marketing ploys' of Dr Gerry McCann:

1. Trademarking Madeleine's coloboma (against the advice of the Portuguese police)

2. Meeting the Pope

3. Yellow ribbons and balloons

4. A succession of largely pre-scripted TV interviews

5. Visiting the White House

6. Connecting to the CEOP and 'Amber Alert' campaigns

7. The carefully-timed releases of videos of Madeleine...and now...

8. Photographing his wife in a swimsuit

PeterMac's Free e-book: What really happened to Madeleine McCann?

Gonçalo Amaral's 'Maddie: Truth of the Lie

Richard D. Hall: 'When Madeleine Died?'

Richard D. Hall: 'When Madeleine Died?'
Please click on image to view all three Madeleine films

Prime Minister introduces Prime Suspect to Royalty

Prime Minister introduces Prime Suspect to Royalty

Popular Posts

Followers

Follow by Email

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *