This is an interesting run of comments from the CMOMM forum that deserves a post of its own on this blog:
@paddinton wrote: I've followed this from the very beginning, Mirror forum then 3 Arguidos. I read occasionally but very rarely post because the views seem so incredibly negative.
Do you all really believe that British coppers are happy to collude in a 'cover-up' involving the demise of a toddler?
What does 'conclusion' mean to you?
@Bishop Brennan wrote: Collusion was never required of any of the British police. The restrictive remit given to SY meant that none of the team were allowed to investigate the parents or the T7. By carefully misdirecting the team right from the start, and making sure that they stayed misdirected - no actual 'cover-up' was ever needed. The team would instead spend 4 years and £12m trying to find an imaginary abductor.
My 'conclusion' therefore : a total waste of everyone's time and money.
Tony Bennett wrote: I beg to differ with both of the above views.
I differ only slightly from @ Bishop Brennan, however. Where I disagree is with this statement of his: "Collusion was never required of any of the British police".
MY REPLY: Top Metropolitan Police officers may be corrupt (Operation Tiberius, Plebgate, Jimmy Savile, Stephen Lawrence, Daniel Morgan etc. etc.) - but they are certainly not fools.
Rebekah Brooks ordered David Cameron who ordered Theresa May who ordered the then Met Commissioner Sir Paul Stephenson to set up the Operation Grange review.
First off, Sir Paul Stephenson could have said: 'No, I am not doing this'.
He asked Commander Simon Foy to be the overall co-ordinator of the review. He also could have said 'No'.
The pair of them then chose Detective Chief Superintendent Hamish Campbell, the Investigating Officer who negligently or deliberately botched the investigation into the murder of Jill Dando, to become the Senior Investigating Officer for this review. Campbell too could have said 'I refuse'.
The three of them - or maybe the entire senior management team of the Met - then approached Detective Chief Inspector Andy Redwood, telling him in terms, 'We'd like you to be the Investigating Officer for this. Ignore the 17 alerts of Eddie and Keela to cadaver odour and blood. Ignore all the lies and contradictions. Spin this out until you've completed your 30 years' service in three years' time'. He also could have refused to accept this poisoned chalice.
Every single one of the above-named colluded in this expensive charade.
And now, by my calculations, Operation Grange has 72 days left.
It was announced on 3 April that six months' further work only was being authorised (by Theresa May), at a further cost of £94,582. That was another 182 days' work (3 April to 2 October 2016), or just under £520 per day.
With 72 days left, they have just over £37,000 left to spend.
Tick tock, tick tock, until 2 October 2016, nine years to the day after Dr Goncalo Amaral was booted off the Madeleine McCann enquiry - on his birthday.
So, after 2 October 2016...
@Verdi wrote: @TonyBennett: ...what next??
At a guess I could say production of the long awaited grand exposé - The Untold Story of Madeleine McCann?
Tony Bennett wrote:
1. New appeals by Kate & Gerry: 'We must continue the search - no-one is now looking for Madeleine'
2. Rush of tabloid articles and even some more new books, along the lines of "Where it all went wrong - the disastrous Portuguese Police investigation and how 'chance after chance was missed'"